Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/GB14_04-2014_219b_Aberfoyle/

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 14/08/2014

GB14/04 Scientific objective: unknown

GB14/04 Priority: 10

PI: Rachel Gaulton

Notes: FW is present Owl is present

Sensors:

Camera (Delivered on 14/10/2014) Fenix (Delivered on 14/10/2014) LiDAR FW LiDAR Owl

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/GB13_01-2014_221_Bury_St_Edmunds/

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 14/08/2014

GB13/01 Scientific objective: a combination of an ecological model with remotely sensed data can result in an accurate, high resolution map of vegetation communities. Such maps can form the basis to model the distribution of animal species or groups.

GB13/01 Priority: 9

PI: Tim Benton

Notes: There is FW A couple of lines are very long Nav is in two parts, it restarts after first line

Sensors:

Camera (Requested) Delivered 11/11/2014 Fenix (Requested) Delivered 11/11/2014 LiDAR (Requested) Delivered 11/11/2014 FW LiDAR (Not Requested) Delivered 11/11/2014

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/RG13_08-2014_175b_Wytham_Woods_Plus_Airsar/

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 25/06/2014

RG13/08 Scientific objective: RG13/08

RG13/08 Priority: 8?

AIRSAR Scientific objective: unknown

AIRSAR Priority: ?

PI: David Coomes

Notes: Fenix line 4 raw is tiny and looks like line failed. Lines 1,3,6 have slightly higher than usual difference between fps_set and fps_qpf (over 0.25 but under 1). Line 4 has a crazy fps_qpf value. Raw fenix 5 is not a proper flightline - don't processs this. There is FW.

Sensors:

Fenix (11/11/2014) LiDAR (11/11/2014) FW LiDAR (11/11/2014) RCD (11/11/2014)