Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#450 closed flight processing
RG12/10, flight day 208/2012, Milton Keynes — at Version 28
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | adbe |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 medium | Milestone: | 2012 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by besm)
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2012/flight_data/uk/RG12_10-2012_208_Milton_Keynes
Data arrived from ARSF via SATA disk on 27/07/2012
RG12/10 Scientific objective:
RG12/10 Priority: 8h
PI: Karen Anderson
Sensors:
Camera (11/09/2012)
Eagle (13/11/2012)
Hawk (13/11/2012)
LiDAR (13/11/2012)
FW LiDAR (30/01/2013)
Change History (28)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
Navigation Processed
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
Camera delivery created
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
Hyperspectral delivery created
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
Delivery checking camera.
comment:7 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
Delivery check complete. No problems found. Ready to deliver.
comment:8 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
Hyperspectral delivery is actually just Eagle as we don't have a boresight for Hawk yet.
Beginning Eagle delivery check.
comment:9 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
- Owner set to adbe
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:10 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
Finished delivery check.
All looks good apart from:
- rename delivery to RG12_10-208-eagle-20120827 (do this for 206b too)
- OSTNO2 file - think this should be in a misc directory. Don't forget to update ReadMe contents.
- Remove Hawk examples from ReadMe Contents
- In the filenumber->flightline name list, explain missing 046a or omit from this list. Get rid of blank Hawk section of this list.
- In quality/issues section, explain better what is wrong with line 10, layman will not understand 'sct'
Have ran zip_mapped.sh
comment:11 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
Removed OSTN02_NTV2.gsb file
Removed Hawk example from ReadMe contents
Renamed to eagle delivery
Removed 046a, and Hawk column
Rewritten quality issues
comment:12 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
- Description modified (diff)
Delivered Camera to Karen Anderson on 11/09/2012 on disk 44
comment:13 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Decided on pitch and roll errors for this flight, although I'm still checking them. To 4 significant figures, they are:
Pitch: -0.002870
Roll: +0.0001842
comment:14 Changed 12 years ago by besm
After checking the flightlines, most were pretty good, except the milton_x line (the one that crosses all other lines) for some reason. It was off by about 30cm on the ground. It seemed to be nearly completely pitch error, so the following values are what I've chosen for just the milton_x flight line:
Pitch: -0.003019
Roll: +0.0001842
comment:15 Changed 12 years ago by anhi
LiDAR delivery check:
- Maximum and minimum Y values in "per flight line statistics" incorrect. Just remake tex file once lasinfo_reader.py is updated.
- Looks like not all overlapping lines have an elevation difference recorded.
- Remove the .tex, .out, .aux and .log Read_Me files from the delivery directory.
comment:16 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Done points 1 and 3. We discussed this and decided the case for the second point wasn't strong enough considering the accuracy of the resultant table anyway, so that's being left as-is.
Otherwise, should be ready to deliver. Marking as ready to delivery check.
comment:17 Changed 12 years ago by anhi
All looks fine now, ready to deliver without vectors.
comment:18 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Finally completed delivery for hawk, and ammended the eagle readme. Ready to delivery check. A couple of things to keep in mind are:
- There are seperate deliveries for the hawk and eagle.
- The script(s?) assumed there were 22 flightlines available when writing the readme, but there is no hyperspectral data for flightline 046b. The latex files have been edited by hand to correctly number the flightlines. I also wrote the correct mapping into a file called FLIGHTLINE_TO_FILE_MAPPING.txt in the processing directory and made it read-only.
- Several different scripts fell down making this delivery, so the delivery checker should look carefully for things not being where they should be. I've already tried to make sure everything's there though, so shouldn't be any problems.
comment:19 Changed 12 years ago by anhi
Hawk delivery check complete:
- Mention dropped scan in hawk line 14.
- Hawk delivery readme lists eagle lines in the delivery contents which wont be there.
Proj_tidy.sh does not work with half deliveries so compared everything to the file structure and naming list manually
comment:20 Changed 12 years ago by besm
All fixed and ready to go.
comment:21 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Scratch that last comment. Delivery needs FW LiDAR. Awaiting FW boresight.
comment:22 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Sending without FW LiDAR after updating data quality report to the one found in ~arsf/documents_in_svn/lidar/reports/*1109.pdf
comment:23 Changed 12 years ago by besm
- Description modified (diff)
comment:24 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Delivered everything, camera (again), hawk, eagle, LiDAR to Karen Anderson on 13/11/2012 on disk 133.
comment:25 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Completed full-waveform LiDAR delivery, ready for delivery checking.
comment:26 Changed 12 years ago by anhi
Full-Waveform delivery check:
No Problems
comment:27 Changed 12 years ago by besm
Delivered LiDAR full-waveform to Karen Anderson+Antoine Cottin on 30/01/2013 on either disk 148 or 150.
comment:28 Changed 12 years ago by besm
- Description modified (diff)
All the webcam files are blank for this project - will e-mail Phil about it.
Files for first eagle line were incorrectly named as datacube.*, have fixed.