Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#523 closed flight processing (fixed)
GB13/10, flight day 156/2014, Wytham Woods
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | benj |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 medium | Milestone: | 2014 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by tec)
Data location: /data/visuyan2/scratch/arsf/2014/flight_data/uk/GB13_10-2014_156_Wytham/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 05/06/2014
GB13/10 Scientific objective: unknown
GB13/10 Priority: 8
PI: Anne Verhoef
Notes: There is OWL data for this flight. There is FW LiDAR for this flight.
Sensors:
Camera (Requested but lower priority), delivered 21/08/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
Fenix (Requested), delivered 21/08/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
LiDAR (Requested), delivered 21/08/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
FW LiDAR, delivered 21/08/2014
OWL
Change History (31)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
Created new readme, ready for D/C
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Started RCD Processing
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by tec
RCD images not in the LiDAR boundary:
26, 68, 82, 96, 124, 174
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Finished RCD processing. Awaiting delivery check.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Completed delivery checking processed RCD data. Awaiting second delivery check from stgo.
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Some dark photographs in the delivery due to clouds, a comment should be made about this in the read me file.
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Starting delivery check.
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Line 12 header file is missing.
flightlines/mapped/f156123b_mapped_osng.bil.hdr
No mosaic with vectors, check with PI if they want vectors.
apl_corr command is wrong, thinks it wants to use NEXTMAP dem files not ASTER dem files.
apl_corr is also wrong in the readme, its using absolute paths so contains filepaths with visuyan in it, it also had NEXTMAP dems in the command.
Readme says UNKNOWN SENSOR not fenix just after apl_corr command.
fenix_viewvector_list.txt doesnt have windows line endings, check if they need to be the windows style of CRLF
In the doc directory there are the CSS files
ISO019115-stylesheet.xsl
ISO019115-css.css
Level 1 line 1 bands 356-368 look dark and has overflows. Band 621 is blank.
Have not checked the other level 1 lines or the level 3 mapped files.
comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
Currently processing the LiDAR data. Roll error of -0.005552596 seems to be consistent across flightlines. Now classifying.
comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
Lidar with full waveform created ready for DC.
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
Made corrections noted above and added readme comment about overflows. REady for re D/C
*also note I've emailed the PI about waiting on vectors.
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Added in the readme about underflows. Ready to deliver. Underflow bands 490-540 590-621. Running zip_mapped.sh.
comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Beginning LiDAR delivery check
comment:16 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR delivery check complete, the following issues should be addressed before delivery of the data:
- No full waveform files found
- If las1.2 files were created, will need to change read me as it says 1.0 currently.
- LiDAR ASCII files don't have CRLF terminators - should they?
- There is a .tif file in the screenshots directory - should this be there?
- One of the lines appears to be of an odd shape (LDR-GB13_10-2014-156-07.LAS), which wasn't mentioned in the data quality remarks.
comment:17 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
Lidar ready for recheck.
comment:18 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Rechecking LiDAR delivery.
comment:19 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Delivery Check
The following issues were found and need to be resolved:
- FW LAS files have been given names that don't adhere to the file naming convention.
- GRIMM data was acquired, but not highlighted in the logsheet.
- Data quality remarks uses word "ditched" - this is slang.
- enp files have been left in the dem directory, these should be removed.
The following issues were found and have been resolved:
- full-waveform.pdf missing from doc directory (copied from day 169's LiDAR delivery directory).
- Intensity tif has been left in screenshots (removed)
PI is happy to wait for vectors, but would like to be kept informed of progress. Missing vectors screenshot is therefore not a problem.
comment:20 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Checked LiDAR delivery issues indicated above after corrections were made. No issues found. LiDAR now ready for delivery.
comment:21 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Creating delivery for all data from day 156.
comment:22 Changed 10 years ago by dap
All data dispatched to Prof. Verhoef, 21/08/2014.
comment:23 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
- Description modified (diff)
- Owner set to benj
comment:24 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Fenix
Changed line 2 SCT to -0.08
comment:25 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Fenix
Ready for delivery check.
comment:26 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
Done Fenix delivery check.
All looks good apart from:
Minor problems:
- Fodis dir should not be present
Don't forget to zip up the mapped files.
comment:27 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Fenix
Removed fodis directory.
Zipping mapped files now.
comment:28 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Fenix
Delivery available on FTP arsf4 for PI
comment:29 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Archiving
Starting archiving
comment:30 Changed 10 years ago by tec
- Description modified (diff)
Archiving
Done confirmed as of 13/05/2015 12:10
comment:31 Changed 9 years ago by dac
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Tipo didn't leave any notes, as such I am collecting what I can from the processing cfgs. He has however created a delivery for the hyperspectral data. I will submit this for delivery check once a readme is prepared.
SCT values below:
Pixel size used: 1.2
Inspection of the data presents a couple of cloud shadows on the data but otherwise it seems fine.