#530 closed flight processing (fixed)
RG12/09, flight day 172/2014, Wessex
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | benj |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 5 | Milestone: | 2014 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by tec)
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/RG12_09-2014_172_Wessex
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 23/06/2014
RG12/09 Scientific objective: Unknown
RG12/09 Priority: a5
PI: France Gerard
Notes: There is OWL data. The last line is missing though, and the last 8 lines are missing blackbody data. There is FW data. Deleted 3 corrupted webcam imagesL 1020, 1015, 1037
Sensors:
Camera (Requested), Delivered 10/09/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
Fenix (Requested), Delivered 10/09/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
LiDAR (Requested), Delivered 08/10/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
FW LiDAR (?), Delivered 08/10/2014, Archvied 13/05/2015
Change History (38)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by tec
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Trimmed down the gps start and end times to 550800 - 560880.
Finished nav processing
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Began Fenix processing.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Started LiDAR processing.
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Beginning RCD processing
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by dap
SCT values for Fenix data:
Flightline | FENIX |
1 | 0.95 |
2 | 0.97 |
3 | 0.99 |
4 | 0.98 |
5 | 0.95 |
6 | 0.90 |
7 | 0.90 |
8 | 0.90 |
9 | 0.97 |
10 | 0.93 |
11 | 0.95 |
12 | 1.10 |
13 | 1.09 |
14 | 0.96 |
15 | 0.90 |
16 | 0.90 |
17 | 0.93 |
Edit: Delivery check revealed that some of the SCT values were incorrect, so they have been changed in this comment.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Completed Fenix processing and created delivery and readme. Awaiting delivery check.
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by dap
RCD processing complete, awaiting delivery check.
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Starting RCD DC.
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Found some issues:
- In ReadMe where it displays a thumbnail for each RCD line, the lines are out of order, ie 10 comes after 18.
- Photos 335-339, look a bit over exposed.
Thats it, RCD DC finished.
comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Asked mark1 about the ordering of the flight lines in the read me, this is the correct order since this is the order the lines were flown in.
- Checked the images found to be over-exposed against Google Earth's satellite imagery and found that the camera images weren't over exposed.
RCD images ready for delivery.
comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
Beginning Fenix delivery check.
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
Found a lot of problems with delivery so am going to fail this at this point and will check it properly when these are done. Be sure to check obvious things before you submit for delivery check such as none of the folders are empty.
Current issues:
- No logsheet. Create and submit for checking.
- ReadMe flightline filenames table is messed up. Easiest way to fix is to put /newpage before the table in the tex.
- Remove flightlines/fodis directory as this is not needed with fenix.
- No screenshots - need to create these
- project_information/ dir is empty
- No xsl or css files present in the doc/ directory (talk to mark1 or maybe stgo)
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Fixed all problems found. Ready for re-delivery check.
comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
2nd Delivery Check of HS.
Major fail:
Looked at screenshots and found sct wobbles. Line 14 and Line 11 for example. Please go back and correct SCTS. Then resubmit for checking.
Also found minor points below:
- Remove unzipped mapped files from directory
- Screenshots - first file is missing
- Screenshots - remove sct part from names
- Would rewrite data quality remark slightly: "Some flightlines [or give lines if known] are partly obscured by cloud cover".
- sensor_FOV_vectors/fenix_viewvector_list.txt should be a windows compatible text file
comment:16 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Correcting problems found in Hyperspectral
comment:17 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Changed SCT values to:
Flight line | FENIX |
11 | 0.95 |
14 | 0.96 |
4 | 0.98 |
5 | 0.95 |
comment:18 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Hyperspectral Fenix
Issues fixed, ready for delivery check.
comment:19 Changed 10 years ago by tec
LiDAR
Flightline | Roll | Pitch |
---|---|---|
090258 | -0.005802596 | -0.000857190 |
091241 | -0.005802596 | -0.000857190 |
092213 | -0.006022596 | -0.000857190 |
093055 | -0.005402596 | -0.000702190 |
094204 | -0.006202596 | -0.000857190 |
095055 | -0.005202596 | -0.000857190 |
100014 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
101015 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
101959 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
103315 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
105715 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
110516 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
111208 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
112040 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
112813 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
113544 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
114122 | -0.005722596 | -0.000857190 |
comment:20 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
Done Hyperspectral delivery check.
Minor problems:
- Last band is blank. Check with Mark or Ben if this is supposed to be happening.
- Should change Quality Issues bit in ReadMe that talks about cloudiness. I think it should say 'many' instead of 'some' - there are a LOT of clouds over this collection, as you can see in the mosaic screenshot
- Make sure to zip up the mapped files before sending
comment:21 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Hyperspectral Fenix
I've spoken to benj about the last band being blank and he said this has been an issue before and that it's due to a problem with the calibration. This is, however, not a problem.
Also changed the data quality remarks and updated readme.
comment:22 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Copying RCD and Fenix data on to hard drive.
comment:23 Changed 10 years ago by dap
RCD and Fenix data delivered to Dr Gerard at Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 10/09/2014.
comment:24 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Description modified (diff)
comment:25 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
- Owner set to benj
comment:26 Changed 10 years ago by tec
LiDAR
Finished creating a delivery, awaiting delivery check.
comment:27 Changed 10 years ago by lah
Lidar delivery check - Only minor issues
- Why are there 19 flight lines, but only 17 in log? There are also only 17 .trj files.
- Do we need an empty HSI page in log?
- I have changed DEM header resolution to 2.0.
- Mean height from demcompare is -0.34.
- What are the actual roll and pitch offsets for wiki?
comment:28 Changed 10 years ago by tec
One line was split into 3 lines.
Nothing can be done for the logsheet, logsheet script really needs redoing.
Updated Pitch and Roll in wiki
comment:29 Changed 10 years ago by lah
Lidar Delivery Check Complete
I have removed the extra page in the logsheet, so ready to deliver. The logsheet script still needs changing.
comment:30 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Description modified (diff)
LiDAR data delivered to Dr Gerard, 08/10/2014
comment:31 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Archiving
Starting archiving
comment:32 Changed 10 years ago by tec
- Description modified (diff)
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Archiving
Done confirmed as of 13/05/2015 12:10
comment:33 Changed 9 years ago by lah
Fenix re-DC
- Have removed empty Eagle & Hawk page from logsheet.
- spectra now look good.
- only 1 problem remains: there are a lot of overflows in the readme (all VNIR bands) which don't show up in fastQC. Suggest that we need to double check overflows and figure out what's going wrong (and how to fix fastQC) before delivery.
comment:34 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix
Have checked radiance values against Py6S simulations and looks good. Zipping files and marking as ready to deliver.
comment:35 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Reprocessed Hyperspectral data sent off to Dr Gerrard on 21st August 2015 via USB Hard Disk
comment:36 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Archiving
Starting archiving due to reprocessing. Files currently being uploaded.
comment:37 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Archiving
Finished. Notification mail: on hold
comment:38 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Archiving
Data available from NEODC: http://browse.ceda.ac.uk/browse/neodc/arsf/2014/RG12_09/RG12_09-2014_172_Wessex
Started navigation processing