RG12/09, flight day 172/2014, Wessex

[knpa]

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/RG12_09-2014_172_Wessex

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 23/06/2014

RG12/09 Scientific objective: Unknown

RG12/09 Priority: a5

PI: France Gerard

Notes: There is OWL data. The last line is missing though, and the last 8 lines are missing blackbody data. There is FW data. Deleted 3 corrupted webcam imagesL 1020, 1015, 1037

Sensors:

Camera (Requested), Delivered 10/09/2014
Fenix (Requested), Delivered 10/09/2014
LiDAR (Requested)
FW LiDAR (?)

[tec]

Started navigation processing

HUNG Basestation Data
Latitude	51 24 15.45169
Longitude	-1 30 50.17037
El Height	183.194m

[tec]

Trimmed down the gps start and end times to 550800 - 560880.

Finished nav processing

[dap]

Began Fenix processing.

[tec]

Started LiDAR processing.

[dap]

Beginning RCD processing

[dap]

SCT values for Fenix data:

Flightline	FENIX
1	0.95
2	0.97
3	0.99
4	0.98
5	0.95
6	0.90
7	0.90
8	0.90
9	0.97
10	0.93
11	0.95
12	1.10
13	1.09
14	0.96
15	0.90
16	0.90
17	0.93

Edit: Delivery check revealed that some of the SCT values were incorrect, so they have been changed in this comment.

[dap]

Completed Fenix processing and created delivery and readme. Awaiting delivery check.

[dap]

RCD processing complete, awaiting delivery check.

[tec]

Starting RCD DC.

[tec]

Found some issues:

• In ReadMe where it displays a thumbnail for each RCD line, the lines are out of order, ie 10 comes after 18.
• Photos 335-339, look a bit over exposed.

Thats it, RCD DC finished.

[dap]

• Asked mark1 about the ordering of the flight lines in the read me, this is the correct order since this is the order the lines were flown in.
• Checked the images found to be over-exposed against Google Earth's satellite imagery and found that the camera images weren't over exposed.

RCD images ready for delivery.

[knpa]

Beginning Fenix delivery check.

[knpa]

Found a lot of problems with delivery so am going to fail this at this point and will check it properly when these are done. Be sure to check obvious things before you submit for delivery check such as none of the folders are empty.

Current issues:

• No logsheet. Create and submit for checking.
• ReadMe flightline filenames table is messed up. Easiest way to fix is to put /newpage before the table in the tex.
• Remove flightlines/fodis directory as this is not needed with fenix.
• No screenshots - need to create these
• project_information/ dir is empty
• No xsl or css files present in the doc/ directory (talk to mark1 or maybe stgo)

[dap]

Fixed all problems found. Ready for re-delivery check.

[knpa]

2nd Delivery Check of HS.

Major fail:
Looked at screenshots and found sct wobbles. Line 14 and Line 11 for example. Please go back and correct SCTS. Then resubmit for checking.

Also found minor points below:

• Remove unzipped mapped files from directory
• Screenshots - first file is missing
• Screenshots - remove sct part from names
• Would rewrite data quality remark slightly: "Some flightlines [or give lines if known] are partly obscured by cloud cover".
• sensor_FOV_vectors/fenix_viewvector_list.txt should be a windows compatible text file

[dap]

Correcting problems found in Hyperspectral

[dap]

Changed SCT values to:

Flight line	FENIX
11	0.95
14	0.96
4	0.98
5	0.95

[dap]

Hyperspectral Fenix

Issues fixed, ready for delivery check.

[tec]

LiDAR

Flightline	Roll	Pitch
090258	-0.005802596	-0.000857190
091241	-0.005802596	-0.000857190
092213	-0.006022596	-0.000857190
093055	-0.005402596	-0.000702190
094204	-0.006202596	-0.000857190
095055	-0.005202596	-0.000857190
100014	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
101015	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
101959	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
103315	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
105715	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
110516	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
111208	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
112040	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
112813	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
113544	-0.005722596	-0.000857190
114122	-0.005722596	-0.000857190

[knpa]

Done Hyperspectral delivery check.

Minor problems:

• Last band is blank. Check with Mark or Ben if this is supposed to be happening.
• Should change Quality Issues bit in ReadMe that talks about cloudiness. I think it should say 'many' instead of 'some' - there are a LOT of clouds over this collection, as you can see in the mosaic screenshot
• Make sure to zip up the mapped files before sending

[dap]

Hyperspectral Fenix

I've spoken to benj about the last band being blank and he said this has been an issue before and that it's due to a problem with the calibration. This is, however, not a problem.

Also changed the data quality remarks and updated readme.

[dap]

Copying RCD and Fenix data on to hard drive.

[dap]

RCD and Fenix data delivered to Dr Gerard at Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 10/09/2014.