Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#537 closed flight processing
RG13/08, AIRSAR, flight day 175b/2014, Wytham Woods — at Version 29
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | benj |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 medium | Milestone: | 2014 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | dac | Other processors: | dap, tec |
Description (last modified by dap)
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/RG13_08-2014_175b_Wytham_Woods_Plus_Airsar/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 25/06/2014
RG13/08 Scientific objective: RG13/08
RG13/08 Priority: 8?
AIRSAR Scientific objective: unknown
AIRSAR Priority: ?
PI: David Coomes
Notes: Fenix line 4 raw is tiny and looks like line failed. Lines 1,3,6 have slightly higher than usual difference between fps_set and fps_qpf (over 0.25 but under 1). Line 4 has a crazy fps_qpf value. Raw fenix 5 is not a proper flightline - don't processs this. There is FW.
Sensors:
Fenix (11/11/2014)
LiDAR (11/11/2014)
FW LiDAR (11/11/2014)
RCD (11/11/2014)
Change History (29)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by dap
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by dac
Started RCD processing.
tec did raw RCD to Tiff conversion as was already set up on his machine.
Created and checked thumbnails.
Waiting on nav data
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by dap
For the first five seconds of the first flightline, the navigation data has a quality of 2, not 1.
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Navigation processing complete, now beginning LiDAR Processing.
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Hyperspectral Processing
Started processing fenix.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by dac
Tagged RCD images using navigation data. No navigation data available for 153 and 154.
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Navigation Processing
Messed up the nav, reprocessed nav, got even better solution. Copying over now.
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Note, logsheet will need reproducing before delivery of LiDAR or Hyperspectral data, since navigation data had to be reprocessed.
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Hyperspectral Processing
Line 4 is unusable.
SCT Values
Flightline | FENIX |
---|---|
1 | 0.98 |
2 | 0.99 |
3 | 0.95 |
4 | N/A |
5 | 0.94 |
6 | 0.99 |
7 | 0.90 |
8 | 0.98 |
comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Hyperspectral Processing
Ready for delivery check
comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Processing
Found a bug in alsproc on grid while trying to find roll correction values. Bug has been reported, will run on local machine instead.
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by dac
RCD Processing
Reprocessed RCD data with new navigation data, have made delivery but script to produce readme is giving error that none of the images are in the list of photos from kml file - looking into.
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Processing
Found roll error for lines 163102 and 162305 to be -0.004264393 radians. Will now process other lines with this roll error to check for consistency.
comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Processing
Found roll error for cross line (161004) to be -0.004434392 radians
comment:16 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Processing
All roll errors have now been found. There was a lack of buildings in the overlaps between flightlines, so flat terrain was used where possible to determine these roll errors (table includes roll errors found previously):
Flightline | Roll error | Pitch error |
---|---|---|
155434 (01) | -0.003934392 | -0.000880469 |
155755 (02) | -0.004434392 | -0.000880469 |
160129 (03) | -0.003934392 | -0.000880469 |
160503 (04) | -0.003934392 | -0.000880469 |
161004 (05) | -0.004434392 | -0.000880469 |
162305 (AS1) | -0.004264393 | -0.000880469 |
163102 (AS2) | -0.004264393 | -0.000880469 |
Will now process deliverable files using ALSPP
comment:17 Changed 10 years ago by dac
RCD Processing
Found error with 'create_latex_camera_readme.py' was naming of files, which used 'AIRSAR' instead of the project code. Renamed files and ran OK. Also updated scripts to print error message for naming errors.
Ready for delivery check.
comment:18 Changed 10 years ago by dac
Starting Hyperspectral Delivery Check
comment:19 Changed 10 years ago by tec
RCD Delivery Check
Delivery check started.
comment:20 Changed 10 years ago by tec
RCD Delivery Check
Would say in data quality 00001 is over exposed, 0004-9 00014,00015 have blue'ish tint around edge.
Once you've done that, its ready to go.
comment:21 Changed 10 years ago by dac
Hyperspectral Delivery Check
Delivery check complete, some minor issues corrected. Ready to deliver.
- Project code listed in read me as 'RG13/08 AIRSAR' rather than just 'RG13/08' - have corrected.
- Lines 4 and 5 missing, 5 not on logsheet, line 4 mentioned in readme.
- In mask file, refers to Eagle smear correction, have changed and in template to just smear correction (even though it only applies to Eagle sensor).
- In level 1b data bands 240 - 260 are noisy (absorption features?) and in line 6 there is a large cloud shadow in centre of image causing some underflows.
- Suggest changing delivery directory name from 'AIRSAR-175b' to use project code (RCD also needs to be changed).
comment:22 Changed 10 years ago by dac
RCD Processing
Added text to data quality. Renamed directory from AIRSAR-175b to use project code.
Will send with hyperspectral data once hard drives are available.
comment:23 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Awesome, thanks for corrections. I shall mark the hyperspectral and rcd as ready to deliver. Shall also prod ben about hard drives today.
comment:24 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Processing
Read me has been created, now just need to measure elevation differences and add them in to the table in the read me.
comment:25 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Processing
Added elevation differences to read me. Processed LiDAR data now ready for quality check.
comment:26 Changed 10 years ago by dac
LiDAR Delivery Check
Started LiDAR Delivery Check.
comment:27 Changed 10 years ago by dac
LiDAR Delivery Check
Delivery check complete, fixed some minor issues. Ready to deliver.
- ASCII lidar files didn't have windows line endings - fixed.
- Contains clouds, have been classified out as noise OK.
- Full waveform data not requested but processed anyway.
- Lines 1 -- 5 are missing a lot of waveforms when viewed in Waveviewer. These were all low altitude lines so I think the problems could be due to the time between each return pulse being too small for the digitiser. This is just a guess though.
- No errors converting data to LAZ format.
- Reworded sentance 'Elevation differences could not be measured between many of the low altitude lines and the cross-line as the areas of overlap lack in flat terrain.' to 'Elevation differences could not be measured between many of the low altitude lines and the cross-line as there were insufficient areas of flat terrain.'
- Difference to ASTER (from demcompare.py) 0.6 m
comment:28 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Hyperspectral
Renamed individual flightline screenshots from <flightline name>_mapped_osng.bil.jpg to <flightline name>.jpg (ran rename.sh -f _mapped_osng.bil.jpg .jpg from screenshots directory).
comment:29 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Cc dac added
- Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
- Description modified (diff)
- Other processors set to dap, tec
- Owner set to benj
All data delivered to Dr Coomes at the University of Cambridge (11/11/2014)
Navigation Processing