Opened 10 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#561 closed flight processing (fixed)
MA14/08, flight day 317/2014, North Selangor Peat Swamp Forest
Reported by: | dap | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | whenever | Milestone: | |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by dac)
Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/malaysia/MA14_08-2014_317_Selangor
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 05/01/2015.
Scientific objective: to characterise spatially how oil palm cultivation is degrading tropical peatland ecosystem services, using airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR imagery, and supported by an intensive field campaign, in Malaysia’s North Selangor tropical peat swamp forest.
Priority:
PI: Paul Aplin
PI is happy to receive data by USB Hard Disk, network transfer or DVD
Co-I Doreen Boyd requested delivery via USB Hard Drive
The following webcam images were removed as they are corrupt:
141113_025040_000.jpg
141113_004729_000.jpg
141113_014456_000.jpg
OWL data were collected and are present. proj_tidy does, however, suggest that too few dark frames were collected for file Peninsular_Selangor_Paul_Aplin_0305.hdr (only 44 dark frames collected).
Sensors:
- Fenix (requested)
- LiDAR (requested)
- FW LiDAR (requested)
- RCD (requested, lower priority)
Change History (32)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by mark1
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Navigation Processing
Started navigation processing
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Basestation data
Have had to convert the basestation using teqc
Latitude | 3 07 31.68506 |
Longitude | 01 33 43.26778 |
ELL. Height | 18.839 m |
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Lidar Processing
Started. There is a lack of useful features for geo-corrections (No roofs or edges), pitch and roll errors expected to be less accurate.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Hyperspectral Processing
Starting hyperspectral processing.
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Hyperspectral Processing - SCT values
Found SCT values. Flightline 18 did not pass the navigation process.
Flightline | FENIX |
1 | 0.97 |
2 | 0.89 |
3 | 0.93 |
4 | 0.94 |
5 | 1.01 |
6 | 0.90 |
7 | 0.98 |
8 | 0.95 |
9 | 0.95 |
10 | 0.95 |
11 | 0.97 |
12 | 0.90 |
13 | 0.95 |
14 | 0.97 |
15 | 0.98 |
16 | 1.00 |
17 | 0.98 |
18 | N/A |
19 | 0.98 |
20 | 1.02 |
21 | 0.99 |
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Hyperspectral Processing
Awaiting new calibration for fenix
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by asm
LiDAR Processing
Found pitch and roll values, consistent for all lines:
Roll | -0.0061 |
Pitch | -0.00055 |
Starting classification.
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by asm
LiDAR Processing
Finished classification. Due to the extend of low clouds on flightline 011 (LDR13112_025741_1.LAS), some points could be wrong classified (vegetation classified as noise).
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by asm
LiDAR Processing
The elevation difference could not be calulated between several flightlines because the amount vegetation was dominant and therefore, they lack of usable features.
comment:13 Changed 9 years ago by asm
LiDAR Processing
Delivery created.
comment:14 Changed 9 years ago by asm
LiDAR Processing
Readme created. Ready for Delivery Check.
comment:15 Changed 9 years ago by stgo
Lidar Delivery check
Beginning Lidar check
comment:16 Changed 9 years ago by stgo
Lidar Delivery check
- Link to aster policies 404s in readme, check with dap if his changes to the template have been accepted.
- Data quality remarks:
extend - extents
"Moreover, the elevation difference could not be calulated between several flightlines because the amount vegetation was dominant and therefore, they lack of usable features."
would read better as
"The elevation difference between several flightlines could not be measured due to a dominance of vegetation masking usable features"
I still don't like several flightlines though, it would be better to specify which ones (unless its all of them)
- flightlines/discrete_laser/las1.0 should be called las1.2
- The fw_laser folder contains a las1.3 folder but there are no fw files? Same for TRJ files, I'm assuming they just weren't copied during the delivery creation procedure, these need to be classified and copied in.
Proj tidy is complaining about the naming of sol file and lidar intensity screenshot but I can't see why (they look right to me)
comment:17 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Lidar Delivery check
I believe that for proj tidy the sol file should be called:
MA14_08-2014_317.sol versus the previous MA14_08-2014-317.sol
Renamed it just to check if I am right. Not a clue about the intensity screenshot.
-Data quality remarks: Corrected (Thanks stgo).
-New readme created (link to aster policies should have been solved, as far as I know it seems that way)
-las1.0 renamed to las1.2
-las1.3 has now the fw.
-trj files looked good to me.
comment:18 Changed 9 years ago by stgo
Lidar
FW lidar is classifying on asms machine, I have updated the readme.
comment:19 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Lidar Delivery Check
Readme file and everything looking good.
comment:20 Changed 9 years ago by stgo
Lidar Delivery Check
asm has fixed the readme and the full waveform files are now classified. Ready for delivery.
comment:21 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Lidar Delivered 18 August Via FTP
comment:22 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Lidar Delivered
Problems reported downloading the data. Sent a hard drive to Dr. Doreen S. Boyd as requested (15th September 2015)
comment:23 Changed 9 years ago by dac
- Description modified (diff)
comment:24 Changed 9 years ago by stgo
Fenix reprocessing
Ready for delivery check.
This delivery needs to be thoroughly checked for:
- correct lines included
- correct linenames from logsheet
- data quality comments
- spectra shifts
comment:25 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Fenix delivery check
have copied logsheet into directory.
Flightlines 13,14,15 and 20 have high cloud cover in the lower regions. should be mentioned in readme. (20 also has a large blackspot in the screenshots, i think this is because of cloud.)
Screenshots need renaming according to proj tidy.
SRTM dems are in delivery, don't think they are supposed to be.
Data quality report needs updating to 2015 version
checked spectra, looks okay to me.
comment:26 Changed 9 years ago by stgo
Fenix DC
Updated readme with new comment
screenshots renamed
SRTM removed
data quality updated
comment:27 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Fenix DC
Readme comment is now fine,
Screenshot names are fine,
SRTM dem has been removed,
Data quality report is now fine and proj_xml has been changed to match.
needs spectra checking by dac or lah.
comment:28 Changed 9 years ago by lah
Fenix DC - spectra
Have checked spectra for all lines and no major problems. SWIR shift looks within 5 nm, so no problem there. There is a persistent narrow spike and an occasional hump in the overlap region, both of which are in the mask region. The spike is generally larger for the early lines which have lower signal, probably due to the low sun angle.
Ready to deliver once files have finished zipping.
comment:29 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Fenix Delivered via FTP to Paul Aplin and via Hard drive to Doreen Boyd(University of Nottingham) on 11/11/2015
comment:30 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Sent hard drive to Paul Aplin on 23/11/2015 due to problems downloading data via FTP (slow transfer speed).
comment:31 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Archiving
Tidied up ready for archiving. Renamed owl data. Line 21 had no hdr file so created a dummy one for renaming then removed.
Started uploading to NEODC.
comment:32 Changed 8 years ago by asm
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Have added a 'gps stop time' to flight line 18 .hdr file based on start time of next line, to replace the original time of xx.xx.xx.x