Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Processing/IPASTC

Timestamp:

May 18, 2011, 4:34:03 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

emca

Comment:

--

Processing/IPASTC

@@ -46 +46 @@
     1. The ambiguity fix is shown on the same plot, for a fixed solution this will be 2. 
     1. Check the Position Accuracy - this should ideally be less than 0.035m in lat/long and 0.05m in height
+    1. To change the plot setting select Tools -> Default Plot Settings. 
    1. If you do not get an acceptable solution, try to change some of the settings and rerun the processing
     1. Select Windows > Project Overview > Configuration. 
     1. On the GNSS tab, select GNSS processing options.
-   
+    1. Adjust the settings and try again (e.g. lower the elevation mask, change the ARTK setting) 
+    1. If you want to compare solutions make sure you change the output name (on the Project Overview window)
+  
+You can also look at the IPAS solution file (to see the Lat/Long trajectory of the aircraft). 
 
-If you still cannot get a good solution, you can try processing using the old IPAS Pro. 
+To compare two solutions select Compare Solution. You need to first create a difference file, selecting the two *.sol files you wish to use. Then load up the difference file (*.dif). 
+
+If you still cannot get a good solution, you can try processing using the old IPAS Pro http://arsf-dan.nerc.ac.uk/trac/wiki/Processing/IPASPro
 
 
@@ -57 +63 @@
 === Additonal Notes: ===
 
-The accuracy using IPAS TC is approximately the same as using IPAS Pro and !GraftNav combined
+The intermediate processing files (e.g. *.fwd, *.rev) are stored in C:\Documents and Settings\$user\Local Settings\Temp\ie - there doesn't seem to be a way to redirect these files elsewhere. They may be needed if we want to be able to import the result into POSPAC?
+
+The accuracy using IPAS TC is approximately the same as using IPAS Pro and !GraftNav combined. 
 IPAS TC can operate with fewer satellites and deeper turns => more reliable observations