#249 closed bug (invalid)
Rescaling dark frames causes calibration errors
Reported by: | benj | Owned by: | benj |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 5 | Milestone: | |
Component: | az* programs | Keywords: | |
Cc: | mggr, jatt | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by mggr)
Processing data in azspec and using the -dIc option to rescale dark frames seems to cause the data to be incorrectly radiometrically calibrated.
I've attached three screenshots. dIc_ex1.png shows spectral profiles for the rescaled flightline from both azspec (top) and CaliGeo (bottom). You can see that the azspec spectrum goes up at both ends, where the CaliGeo spectrum doesn't. The azspec spectrum also has values that are consistently about 600 higher than CaliGeo (discounting the edges of the spectrum, which as mentioned are much higher).
dIc_ex2.png shows spectral profiles from the second flightline, which did not require the dark frames to be rescaled. Azspec and CaliGeo are in very close agreement for this line.
odd_one_out.png is just for illustration - it shows all of the Eagle lines from that flight (as processed through azspec) overlaid. The first flightline (with the rescaled dark frames) is clearly visible as different - much whiter than the other lines.
This may affect any datasets from 2006, and some VOCALS data.
Attachments (4)
Change History (11)
Changed 16 years ago by benj
Changed 16 years ago by benj
Spectral profiles from Eagle line with separate but not rescaled dark frames (GB04-06 line 2)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by benj
Have reported this issue to Bill for investigation.
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by benj
VOCALS data affected by this issue are as follows (thanks Jane):
eagle: line 04 line 05 hawk: line 04 line 05 Vocals day 04 hawk: line 05 line 06 line 07 line 08 Vocals day 05 hawk: line 02 line 03 line 04 line 05 line 06 line 07 line 08 line 09 line 10 line 11 Vocals day 06 eagle: line 03 hawk: line 03
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by benj
Top lines in the previous comment (without a day number) are for day 3 - copy/paste error on my part.
Changed 16 years ago by benj
Image for illustration showing difference of rescaled line (far left, whitish)
comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by benj
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from new to closed
Not doing anything about this, going to produce a program to rescale dark frames as appropriate external to azspec (see #250). Closing this as wontfix unless there turns out to be some problem with the other approach.
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by benj
- Resolution wontfix deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
-dIc option does actually appear to be working. It goes wrong for Eagle but that's because Eagle darkframe values don't appear to vary with integration time (see comments in #250), so its use for Eagle is inappropriate. Seems to work fine for Hawk.
Image shows synthetic data processed with -dIc and with dark frames for correct integration time. Values don't match exactly, but that's due to a combination of the fact that the dark frames were produced using an average value (and dark values for Hawk vary with band) and also the rescaling also necessarily uses only an average scaling value. Values are close enough to say it's behaving correctly given the limitations inherent in the method.
Going to reopen ticket and reclose as invalid rather than wontfix.
comment:6 Changed 15 years ago by benj
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from reopened to closed
comment:7 Changed 15 years ago by mggr
- Description modified (diff)
Added convenience links for later memory assistance ;)
Spectral profiles from Eagle line with rescaled dark frames (GB04-06 line 1)