Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#390 closed flight processing
EUFAR11/03, flight day 092/2011, HYMEDECOS (erosion) — at Version 12
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | mark1 |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 high | Milestone: | 2011 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by emca)
Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EUFAR11_03-2011_092_HYMEDECOS_erosion/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 19/04/11.
Scientific objective:
1) to derive spatial information on vegetation, soil and terrain for hydrological model input by combined hyperspectral and
LiDAR data
(2) to conduct a spectral fingerprinting approach allowing to trace back sources and pathways of sediments. Airborne data
acquisition will be accompanied by an extensive field campaign.
Priority: a4h
PI: H. Kaufmann
Sensors:
- Eagle (27/06/2011)
- Hawk (27/06/2011)
- RCD (27/06/2011)
Change History (12)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by emca
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by anch
Processing RAW camera to tif.
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by mark1
- Owner set to mark1
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by anch
Produced thumbnails from TIFFs
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by anch
camera ready for delivery check
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by iopa
Delivery check on EUFAR11_03-092-hyperspectral-20110614;
- dem header needs to have dem path/filename corrected
- quite a bit of saturation in Eagle on the north side of most flightlines and many wavelengths, around the snowy region. In the same region, Hawk saturates in smaller amounts, different and fewer wavelengths.
- dem name in sample command to geocorrection program is incorrect
- navigation file in geocorrection program sample command says *_post_processed_nav* but everywhere else the format is *_nav_post_processed*
- oversample argument for mapping program has been explicitly specified for processing, maybe should include this in the sample command if this is different than the suggested oversampling and would produce significantly different results / much better results than the automatically suggested oversample factor.
Otherwise the data and delivery are ready to go...
after the data quality report is there (and its name included in the project
metadata) and the binary executables are included.
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by iopa
Checking camera.
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by iopa
Camera delivery check ;
- events file is all double-quoty
- photographs have execute privileges
- could turn EUFAR11_03 to EUFAR11/03 in readme first page if tex file available
- rename kml file to EUFAR11_03-2011_092_HYMEDECOS-erosion.kml in the hope that it satisfies the format and gets included in the readme contents, otherwise include it manually in the tex file
- readme needs re-generating so it uses the new template (not long ago updated) with Pitch-Roll-Heading columns of events file
Otherwise all looks good to deliver.
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by mark1
Hyperspectral data has been processed using an SBET from the Applanix data, with the appropriate boresight and lever arms for this.
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by mark1
Timing offsets:
Eagle line 1: -0.075 | Hawk line 1: -0.115 |
Eagle line 2: -0.055 | Hawk line 2: -0.105 |
Eagle line 3: -0.075 | Hawk line 3: -0.095 |
Eagle line 4: -0.025 | Hawk line 4: -0.005 |
Eagle line 5: -0.035 | Hawk line 5: -0.055 |
Eagle line 6: -0.025 | Hawk line 6: -0.055 |
Eagle line 7: -0.055 | Hawk line 7: -0.885 |
Eagle line 8: -0.065 | Hawk line 8: -0.085 |
Eagle line 9: -0.055 | Hawk line 9: -0.065 |
Eagle line 10: -0.005 | Hawk line 10: -0.065 |
Eagle line 11: -0.075 | Hawk line 11: -0.095 |
Eagle line 12: -0.065 | Hawk line 12: -0.055 |
Eagle line 13: -0.055 | Hawk line 13: -0.085 |
Eagle line 14: -0.035 | Hawk line 14: -0.075 |
Eagle line 15: -0.005 | Hawk line 15: -0.025 |
Eagle line 16: -0.055 | Hawk line 16: -0.105 |
Eagle line 17: -0.015 | Hawk line 17: -0.065 |
Eagle line 18: -0.005 | Hawk line 18: -0.055 |
Eagle line 19: -0.055 | Hawk line 19: -0.075 |
Eagle line 20: -0.055 | Hawk line 20: -0.095 |
Eagle line 21: -0.005 | Hawk line 21: -0.055 |
Eagle line 22: -0.005 | Hawk line 22: -0.075 |
Eagle line 23: -0.055 | Hawk line 23: -0.055 |
Eagle line 24: -0.055 | Hawk line 24: -0.045 |
Eagle line 25: -0.015 | Hawk line 25: -0.025 |
Eagle line 26: -0.055 | Hawk line 26: -0.055 |
comment:12 Changed 13 years ago by emca
- Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
- Description modified (diff)
Camera and Hyperspectral send to PI 27/06/2011
There was no sucessful collection of LiDAR data for this project. Data was reflown on day 095.