Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 11 years ago
#396 assigned flight processing
GB11/00, flight day 083/2011, Chopwell
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | knpa |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | whenever | Milestone: | 2011 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | mggr, emca | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by knpa)
Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/arsf_internal/GB11_00-2011_083_Chopwell
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 04/05/11.
Scientific objective: Gary's "school project", which involves scanning school tables laid out in a grid to make measurements of LIDAR spacing, etc.
Priority: Whenever
PI: ARSF / Danny Donoghue
Sensors:
- Leica LIDAR (done)
Change History (16)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by knpa
- Summary changed from GB11/00, flight day 083/2011, Keyworth to GB11/00, flight day 083/2011, Chopwell
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by mggr
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by mggr
Passed raw data to Graham Stenson (arsf12 FTP) per Gary's request - he'll have a go at processing from raw and let us know how things go.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by mggr
- Cc mggr emca added
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
- Checked against OS vectors
*Delivery made
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Milestone set to 2011 data processing completion
Beginning delivery check
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Owner set to adbe
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Delivery check complete
All looks fine apart from:
- Not 100% sure about PI, mail Gary to check that Danny Donnoghue should indeed receive this data (he might also want a copy sent to himself)
- In ReadMe, get rid of "LiDAR data for Line " from each entry in the left column under the flightline mapping table.
- Readme DEM section says the DEM has been extrapolated when it has actually been patched with SRTM (according to the file name)
- Vectors aren't overlaid in the intensity image in Readme (or the main intensity image)
- Need to compare lines individually in the elevation difference section (though not necessarily all of them.
- One minor height discrepancy found: 10cm diff between line 07 and others (3,13,16) - should be one of the ones mentioned in the Readme
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Changes Made:
1.Danny is PI / co-PI + copy for Gary (collect in PML)
2."LiDAR data for Line " deleted
3.Changed DEM type
4.Overlaid vectors
5.Have done some separate comparison of lines
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
The data has been delivered to Danny Donoghue.
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Have got a disk waiting in PML for Gary
comment:12 Changed 13 years ago by mggr
Hand-delivered to Gary, though he might prefer to process it down at PML! (please update status page if needed)
comment:13 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
- Description modified (diff)
- Owner changed from adbe to knpa
comment:14 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Beginning archiving.
comment:15 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Made available to NEODC (20/06/11)
comment:16 Changed 11 years ago by edfi
FW LiDAR Dispatched to Danny Donoghue
Updated objective section.