Opened 7 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

#396 assigned flight processing

GB11/00, flight day 083/2011, Chopwell

Reported by: knpa Owned by: knpa
Priority: whenever Milestone: 2011 data processing completion
Component: Archiving Keywords:
Cc: mggr, emca Other processors:

Description (last modified by knpa)

Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/arsf_internal/GB11_00-2011_083_Chopwell

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 04/05/11.

Scientific objective: Gary's "school project", which involves scanning school tables laid out in a grid to make measurements of LIDAR spacing, etc.

Priority: Whenever

PI: ARSF / Danny Donoghue

Sensors:

  • Leica LIDAR (done)

Change History (16)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by knpa

  • Summary changed from GB11/00, flight day 083/2011, Keyworth to GB11/00, flight day 083/2011, Chopwell

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by mggr

  • Description modified (diff)

Updated objective section.

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by mggr

Passed raw data to Graham Stenson (arsf12 FTP) per Gary's request - he'll have a go at processing from raw and let us know how things go.

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by mggr

  • Cc mggr emca added

comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by adbe

  • Checked against OS vectors

*Delivery made

comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by knpa

  • Milestone set to 2011 data processing completion

Beginning delivery check

comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by knpa

  • Owner set to adbe
  • Status changed from new to assigned

comment:8 Changed 6 years ago by knpa

Delivery check complete

All looks fine apart from:

  1. Not 100% sure about PI, mail Gary to check that Danny Donnoghue should indeed receive this data (he might also want a copy sent to himself)
  2. In ReadMe, get rid of "LiDAR data for Line " from each entry in the left column under the flightline mapping table.
  3. Readme DEM section says the DEM has been extrapolated when it has actually been patched with SRTM (according to the file name)
  4. Vectors aren't overlaid in the intensity image in Readme (or the main intensity image)
  5. Need to compare lines individually in the elevation difference section (though not necessarily all of them.
  6. One minor height discrepancy found: 10cm diff between line 07 and others (3,13,16) - should be one of the ones mentioned in the Readme

comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by adbe

Changes Made:

1.Danny is PI / co-PI + copy for Gary (collect in PML)
2."LiDAR data for Line " deleted
3.Changed DEM type
4.Overlaid vectors
5.Have done some separate comparison of lines

comment:10 Changed 6 years ago by adbe

The data has been delivered to Danny Donoghue.

comment:11 Changed 6 years ago by adbe

Have got a disk waiting in PML for Gary

comment:12 Changed 6 years ago by mggr

Hand-delivered to Gary, though he might prefer to process it down at PML! (please update status page if needed)

comment:13 Changed 5 years ago by knpa

  • Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
  • Description modified (diff)
  • Owner changed from adbe to knpa

comment:14 Changed 5 years ago by knpa

Beginning archiving.

comment:15 Changed 5 years ago by knpa

Made available to NEODC (20/06/11)

comment:16 Changed 4 years ago by edfi

FW LiDAR Dispatched to Danny Donoghue

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.