Opened 10 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

#411 closed flight processing

EUFAR11/07, flight day 220/2011, Toledo — at Version 11

Reported by: knpa Owned by: knpa
Priority: alpha 4 high Milestone: 2011 data processing completion
Component: Archiving Keywords:
Cc: Other processors:

Description (last modified by knpa)

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EUFAR11_07-2011_220_Toledo/

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 16/08/2011

EUFAR11_07 Scientific objective:
Soil erosion study.

EUFAR code: SEDMEDHY

Priority: a4h

PI: Thomas Schmid

Sensors:

Camera (Collected but not requested)
Eagle (Requested)
Hawk (Requested)
LiDAR (Requested)

Change History (11)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

  • Summary changed from EUFAR11_07, flight day 220/2011, Toledo to EUFAR11/07, flight day 220/2011, Toledo

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

We are currently awaiting Basestation data from Thomas Schmid.

comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

We have received the data referenced above.

comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

  • Owner set to knpa
  • Status changed from new to assigned

Beginning LiDAR processing.

comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

Completed IPAS processing.

Unfortunately result was is less than satisfactory for the first flightline, where the arsf basestation loses it's fix. This could be not improved upon by adding the permanent basestations. The 1-second data from the permanent stations are unavailable for this day apart for SONS (which is a little way away).

comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

Slight horizontal discrepancies which looked like it was caused by a pitch error.
Changed pitch from -0.00324419 to -0.003 which fixed the problem.

comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

This flight suffers from roll error. It is not particularly severe though: there will be a vertical error of approximately 10cm at the edge of the swath width.

The roll discrepancy is not constant between flightlines so will not attempt to correct. Unsure if the error is random. Early flightlines have a positive roll discrepancy but this then seems to switch to negative by the fourth flightline.

comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

The first cross line (14:33) has a large discrepancy with other lines - approximately 45cm.

comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

There is a lot of noise for this flight.

comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

Finished QC, preparing delivery.

comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by knpa

  • Description modified (diff)
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.