Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#411 closed flight processing
EUFAR11/07, flight day 220/2011, Toledo — at Version 11
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | knpa |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 high | Milestone: | 2011 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by knpa)
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EUFAR11_07-2011_220_Toledo/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 16/08/2011
EUFAR11_07 Scientific objective:
Soil erosion study.
EUFAR code: SEDMEDHY
Priority: a4h
PI: Thomas Schmid
Sensors:
Camera (Collected but not requested)
Eagle (Requested)
Hawk (Requested)
LiDAR (Requested)
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Summary changed from EUFAR11_07, flight day 220/2011, Toledo to EUFAR11/07, flight day 220/2011, Toledo
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
We have received the data referenced above.
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Owner set to knpa
- Status changed from new to assigned
Beginning LiDAR processing.
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Completed IPAS processing.
Unfortunately result was is less than satisfactory for the first flightline, where the arsf basestation loses it's fix. This could be not improved upon by adding the permanent basestations. The 1-second data from the permanent stations are unavailable for this day apart for SONS (which is a little way away).
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Slight horizontal discrepancies which looked like it was caused by a pitch error.
Changed pitch from -0.00324419 to -0.003 which fixed the problem.
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
This flight suffers from roll error. It is not particularly severe though: there will be a vertical error of approximately 10cm at the edge of the swath width.
The roll discrepancy is not constant between flightlines so will not attempt to correct. Unsure if the error is random. Early flightlines have a positive roll discrepancy but this then seems to switch to negative by the fourth flightline.
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
The first cross line (14:33) has a large discrepancy with other lines - approximately 45cm.
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
There is a lot of noise for this flight.
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Finished QC, preparing delivery.
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
We are currently awaiting Basestation data from Thomas Schmid.