Opened 13 years ago

Last modified 12 years ago

#419 assigned flight processing

EM10/06, flight day 265/2011, Italy — at Version 22

Reported by: knpa Owned by: jaho
Priority: alpha 4 medium Milestone: 2011 data processing completion
Component: Archiving Keywords:
Cc: Other processors: adbe

Description (last modified by adbe)

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/italy/EM10_06-2011_265_Italy

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 28/09/2011

EM10/06 Scientific objective:
Earthquake study in Italy by examining geology.

EM10/06 Priority: a4m

PI: Ken McCaffrey

Notes: This project was previously flown last year in Greece but since that dataset was confiscated, the project was re-planned for Italy.

Sensors:

Camera (25/11/2011)
Eagle (25/11/2011)
Hawk (25/11/2011)
LiDAR (25/11/2011)

Change History (22)

comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by knpa

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by adbe

Started to process navigation

comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by adbe

Processed navigation

comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by jaho

Starting LiDAR processing.

comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by emca

Blocking LiDAR processing:
Processing shows very low intensity values and max AGC values. This is possibly due to the high altitude of flight during data collection. Querying with Ops.

comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by adbe

Started processing camera

comment:7 follow-up: Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Waiting for rcd logs from Phil (getting them off a disk)

comment:8 Changed 12 years ago by jaho

LiDAR ready for delivery check.

comment:9 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

LiDAR delivery check:

  • Probably should change the data quality remarks, so that it scans better, something like:
    • The intensity values for this flight are very low, it is most likely due to the lines being flown at a high altitude. The intensity values are approximately below 50 and automatic gain control (AGC) values for most points are at a maximum of 255. Thus the elevation values may be incorrect due to the intensity based range correction.
  • There seems to be a slight pitch error in all the lines, don't know how important this is

comment:10 Changed 12 years ago by jaho

Reworded data quality remarks in the ReadMe.

comment:11 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Processing hyperspectral

comment:12 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

There is an eagle line 14 with no corresponding hawk, it is not mentioned in the logsheet, also the raw is black for all bands and has only 200 lines

comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Replying to adbe:

Waiting for rcd logs from Phil (getting them off a disk)

14/10/11

comment:14 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Hyperspectral ready for delivery check

comment:15 Changed 12 years ago by jaho

Hyperspectral delivery check:

Flawless! Ready to deliver.

comment:16 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Do not have any rcd logs, will process without

comment:17 Changed 12 years ago by jaho

Reprocessed LiDAR with pitch offset -0.00299919. Ready for delivery check under EM10_06-265-lidar-20111122/.

comment:18 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Camera ready for delivery check

comment:19 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

LiDAR delivery check:

No problems, ready to deliver

comment:20 Changed 12 years ago by jaho

Camera delivery check:

Not great, but no errors either. Ready to deliver.

comment:21 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

Camera, LiDAR delivered to Ken McCaffrey on 25/11/2011 on disk 104. Hyperspectral delivered to Ken McCaffrey on 25/11/2011 on disk 221

comment:22 Changed 12 years ago by adbe

  • Description modified (diff)
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.