Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#433 assigned flight processing
GB12/00, flight day 082/2012, Little Rissington
| Reported by: | emca | Owned by: | knpa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | 2012 data processing completion |
| Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Other processors: |
Description
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2012/flight_data/arsf_internal/GB12_00-2012_082_little_riss
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 26/03/2012
GB12/00 Scientific objective: Covers several flights for the 2012 season. Boresight and calibration flights
GB12/00 Priority: urgent
PI: ARSF Internal
Notes: Calibration flight over little rissington
Sensors:
Camera (Not Requested)
Eagle (Requested)
Hawk (Requested)
LiDAR (Requested)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by emca
- Milestone set to 2012 data processing completion
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by mark1
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Owner set to knpa
- Status changed from new to assigned
Completed navigation processing for ipas honeywell and ipas20 (new system).
Used the honeywell lever arms for ipas20, which may prove to be incorrect, in which case this will need to be processed again.
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Created hyperpsectral config and an ASTER dem.
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Started LiDAR calibration, having problem with rangecardcal on alspp.
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Fixed rangecard cal issue by logging in as emca.
However, once ran, discovered that it could not get values for bank B as the flight was ran in single pulse rather than multi pulse mode.
This probably means another lidar calibration flight is needed.
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Eagle/Hawk SCTs
Missing values are due to sync/nav errors.
Note that Hawk is always -0.06 or very close - this agrees with earlier tests.
| 01 | 0.01 | -0.06 |
| 02 | 0.00 | -0.06 |
| 03 | -0.06 | |
| 04 | -0.03 | -0.06 |
| 05 | 0.00 | -0.06 |
| 06 | -0.02 | -0.06 |
| 07 | -0.04 | |
| 08 | -0.03 | -0.06 |
| 09 | -0.03 | -0.06 |
| 10 | -0.03 | |
| 11 | -0.01 | -0.04 |
| 12 | -0.03 | |
| 13 | -0.02 | -0.06 |
| 14 | -0.02 | |
| 15 | -0.03 | |
| 16 | 0.00 | -0.03 |
| 17 | 0.01 | -0.04 |
| 18 | 0.01 | -0.08 |
| 19 | -0.03 | |
| 20 | -0.03 | -0.06 |
| 21 | -0.02 | -0.05 |
| 22 | -0.03 | -0.06 |
| 23 | 0.01 | -0.05 |
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Boresight values found:
Eagle
-0.28 0.22 0
Hawk
-0.31 0.28 0
Note that heading is zero for both which is unusual, these might need to be checked.
comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by asm
JSON files - Lidar delivery
Problem with bng dem projection missing, solved using assign_projection.py -p '+proj=tmerc +lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2 +k=0.9996012717 +x_0=400000 +y_0=-100000 +ellps=airy +units=m +no_defs ' GB12_06-2012_172b-lidar_ASTER-bng.dem
comment:10 Changed 6 years ago by dac
LiDAR
Marking as finished on progress page as not still in progress.
Renamed raw hawk/eagle files to have SWIR/VNIR prefix