Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#436 closed flight processing
GB12_06, flight day 083b/2012, Diddington — at Version 20
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | adbe |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 medium | Milestone: | 2012 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | adbe, emca | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by adbe)
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2012/flight_data/uk/GB12_06-2012_083b_Diddington/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 26/03/2012
GB12_06 Scientific objective:
GB12_06 Priority: 8
PI: Anthony Beck
Sensors:
Camera (26/04/2012)
Eagle (07/06/2012)
Hawk (07/06/2012)
LiDAR (07/06/2012)
Change History (20)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
- Priority changed from alpha 4 medium to alpha 4 low
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Navigation processed
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
- Priority changed from alpha 4 low to alpha 4 medium
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Processed RCD, RCD ready for delivery check.
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Processing hyperspectral.
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by emca
Delivery check RCD. No problems with data.
The KML file contains the lidar as well as the Eagle/Hawk flightlines. The names for the lidar lines (less so for Eagle/Hawk) might seem a bit confusing to the PI, especially as they do not get a logsheet with the delivery. Is it worth changing the flight names to be the same as the delivered data format will be rather than the raw file name?
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
kml LiDAR have been renamed, for example LDR-...-01
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
- Description modified (diff)
Camera delivered to Anthony Beck on 26/04/2012 on disk 108.
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Hyperspectral ready for delivery check
comment:12 Changed 13 years ago by emca
Delivery checked the hyperspectral data
Line 06 has a gap in the data in both Eagle and Hawk (but in slightly different places). Need to mention in Readme doc
Readme name is different to what it lists in the readme as the readme name (Read_Me-20120515.pdf & Read_Me-20120517.pdf)
Otherwise ready to deliver
comment:13 Changed 13 years ago by emca
Also for the level1/*mask-badpixelmethod.bil the files are all half what they should be according to the header file. Probably due to an incorrect data type in the header file.
comment:14 Changed 13 years ago by emca
Upon further investigation the *mask-badpixelmethod bil and header files are correct (proj_tidy was giving an incorrect error message) so you can ignore the last comment.
comment:15 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Mentioned about gap in Eagle and Hawk. ReadMe name in contents changed to match name of file.
comment:16 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
Processed LiDAR, LiDAR ready for delivery check.
comment:17 Changed 13 years ago by adbe
- Owner set to adbe
- Status changed from new to accepted
comment:18 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
- Cc adbe emca added
comment:19 Changed 12 years ago by emca
Delivery checked LiDAR data, no problems, ready to deliver.
comment:20 Changed 12 years ago by adbe
- Description modified (diff)
Eagle, Hawk and LiDAR delivered to Anthony Beck on 07/06/2012 on disk 119.
Started navigation processing