Opened 12 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

#459 new flight processing

BGS11/01, flight day 228a/2012, Carlsberg

Reported by: knpa Owned by:
Priority: alpha 4 high Milestone: 2012 data processing completion
Component: Processing: general Keywords:
Cc: Other processors:

Description (last modified by edfi)

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2012/flight_data/greenland_iceland/BGS11_01-2012_228a_Carlsberg

Data arrived from ARSF via SATA disk on 24/09/2012

BGS11/01 Scientific objective: unknown

BGS11/01 Priority: a4h

PI: Tapani Tukiainen

Sensors:

Camera (12/12/2012)
Eagle (12/12/2012)
Hawk (12/12/2012)
LiDAR (12/12/2012)

Change History (27)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by knpa

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Navigation processing completed

comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Ignore above comment - wrong ticket. Starting the navigation processing now.

comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Navigation processing completed - get a poor result for one and a half flight lines in centre of area where the number of GPS satellites drops to 6 and PDOP is ~5.

comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by knpa

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Have processed raw camera files to tiff.

comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Processed lidar (quick process not final) to get tif for checking timing corrections

comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Vertical overlap error inconsistent along flightline, possibly due to the navigation file inaccuracy

comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

LiDAR delivery created. Please check wording in data quality. Is it clear?

comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by besm

Beginning delivery check.

comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by besm

  • Wording of the data quality. Maybe want to mention where the recommended value for distance between GCP and site comes from? Will accuracy of navigation also be affected?
  • Logsheet included is the scanned paper version (albeit unusually neatly written). Is there a reason not to include the digital version?
  • Screenshots were very large. Added some lower resolution versions.

Otherwise, looks fine.

comment:12 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Data quality wording edited.

Digital version of logsheet added

comment:13 follow-up: Changed 11 years ago by besm

Removed old version of log sheet. We tend not to deliver both. (Although maybe we should?) Looks ok otherwise.

comment:14 Changed 11 years ago by anhi

RCD Delivery Created

comment:15 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Beginning RCD delivery check

comment:16 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Check complete all looks fine

comment:17 in reply to: ↑ 13 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Replying to besm:

Removed old version of log sheet. We tend not to deliver both. (Although maybe we should?) Looks ok otherwise.

Might be good to deliver both, as it can sometimes be challenging to read the hand writing. If we did then the PI would be able to look back at the original if they think something is a bit strange.

comment:18 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Hyperspectral delivery created

comment:19 Changed 11 years ago by anhi

Hyperspectral delivery check:

  • Dem incorrectly named and if changed Read Me commands need updating
  • Mention dropped scans in lines e7 and h7

No other problems found

comment:20 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Above hyperspectral delivery check points fixed.

comment:21 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

Hyperspectral and lidar deliveries have been put onto disk 136

comment:22 Changed 11 years ago by mark1

SCT values

Line Eagle SCT Hawk SCT
1 2.30 -0.06
2 -0.02-0.06
3 -0.02-0.06
4 -0.06-0.06
5 0.02 -0.06
6 -0.02-0.06
7 -0.05-0.02
8 -0.03-0.06
9 -0.03-0.02

comment:23 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:24 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Preparing for Archiving

comment:25 Changed 11 years ago by edfi

Archiving - Made available to NEODC (11/04/13)

comment:26 Changed 11 years ago by knpa

Archived by NEODC.

Moved to archive disk.

comment:27 Changed 6 years ago by asm

JSON files - Camera delivery

Removed quotes from images names in the eventfile.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.