Opened 11 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#518 closed flight processing (fixed)
GB12/05, flight day 075/2014, Monks Wood
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 medium | Milestone: | 2014 data processing completion |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by dap)
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2014/flight_data/uk/GB12_05-2014_075_Monks_Wood/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 17/03/2014
GB12/05 Scientific objective: unknown
GB12/05 Priority: 8
PI: Ross Hill
Sensors:
Camera (Requested)
LiDAR (Requested), delivered 25/09/2014
FW LiDAR (Requested but lower priority), delivered 25/09/2014
Fenix (Requested)
Change History (47)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by knpa
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by knpa
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by tipo
Started navigation processing.
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by tipo
Finished navigation processing, started RCD processing.
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by tipo
Started LiDAR processing.
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by tipo
Created hyperspectral delivery.
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by tipo
LiDAR has lines flown at different heights which need slightly different pitch and roll values.
High lines: p=0.00118716 r=-0.003968414
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
RCD D/c in progress
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
RCD d/c complete, no problems found. Will include in delivery this afternoon.
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
RCD data dispatched on 04/06/2014
comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by tipo
LiDAR is taking a long time, as I'm having to find the roll error seperately for each line.
comment:12 Changed 10 years ago by tipo
Higher altitude lines:
line | pitch | roll |
150700 | 0.00113716 | -0.00426684 |
151651 | 0.00113716 | -0.00376841 |
152408 | 0.00113716 | -0.00416841 |
153326 | 0.00113716 | -0.00376841 |
153957 | 0.00108716 | -0.00399841 |
154845 | 0.00108716 | -0.00374841 |
155537 | 0.00108716 | -0.00428414 |
160352 | 0.00108716 | -0.00374841 |
161021 | 0.00118716 | -0.00404841 |
165550 | 0.00118716 | -0.00404841 |
164909 | 0.00118716 | -0.00404841 |
164120 | 0.00118716 | -0.00404841 |
0.00108716 | -0.003968414 |
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by tipo
Lines 151651 and 154845 have areas where they narrow or taper off. The log shows that it was close to the maximum range gate, so its possible it moved slightly out of range, causing the gaps in the data.
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Beginning hyperspectral processing
comment:15 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Hyperspectial processing has stoped due to lack of suitable darkframes. Speaking to ops to get data with an integration time of 20.000
Fenix data has integration times of
Int 1 | Int2 |
---|---|
20.0000 | 10.0000 |
29.3000 | 2.2000 |
25.0000 | 12.0000 |
30.0000 | 18.0000 |
comment:16 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
Low altitude full waveform created.
comment:17 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
High altitude waveform has been created. Lidar ready for delivery check.
comment:18 Changed 10 years ago by dap
Beginning LiDAR delivery check.
comment:19 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Delivery Check
Complete. Issues found as follows:
- Contents page of readme does not have full waveform files listed.
- Link in "Data Details" section is a LAS 1.0 link, but LAS 1.2 data was processed.
- "Per flight line statistics" section is on next page from heading. I'd suggest you put the heading on the next page.
- HAWK data was collected, but typed up logsheet does not reflect this.
- Navigation directory is empty - should contain the .sol, .sup and .trj files.
- Flightline screenshots have ".txt.jpg" file extension - should be just .jpg.
- No vector screenshots - PI has not replied to knpa's email regarding this.
- Multiple LiDAR deliveries found in delivery directory - please delete one.
- Line 18 is oddly shaped - please comment on this in the data quality remarks.
- ASCII files should have had DOS line terminators - I've fixed this.
comment:20 Changed 10 years ago by stgo
I've recreated the readme for the lidar delivery following the comments above.
The logsheet is at fault here, we can't have collected hawk data as the hawk instrument has not been installed in the plane. I think Ops meant the SWIR part of Fenix.
comment:21 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Delivery Check
Rechecking delivery.
comment:22 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Delivery Check
Completed. Issues found were:
- Two LiDAR delivery directories - please remove irrelevant one
- .sup file is missing from navigation directory
- Screenshots named incorrectly - the LDR need not precede the project code in the file names.
- .sol file is named incorrectly - the Julian day should be preceded by a '_' character, not '-'.
comment:23 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR Delivery Check
Complete. proj_tidy complained at screenshot of each flightline - script should be updated to not do this.
LiDAR data ready for delivery.
comment:24 Changed 10 years ago by dap
LiDAR data delivered to Dr Ross Hill, 25/09/2014.
comment:25 Changed 10 years ago by dap
- Description modified (diff)
comment:26 Changed 10 years ago by tec
Archiving
Started
comment:27 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix
Ops have now collected darkframes - resuming processing.
comment:28 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
Found SCT values. Will process VNIR bands but can't deliver SWIR.
Line | SCT |
---|---|
-1 | No data |
-2 | 0.92 Short and not on logsheet (removed) |
-3 | 1 |
-4 | 0.92 |
-5 | 0.96 |
-6 | 0.91 |
-7 | 0.95 |
-8 | 0.9 |
-9 | 1.84 |
-10 | 0.9 |
-11 | 0.99 |
-12 | 0.96 |
-13 | 1 |
-14 | 1.02 |
-15 | 0.93 |
-16 | 0.98 |
-17 | 1.01 |
-18 | 1.03 |
-19 | 0.94 |
-20 | 0.9 |
-21 | 0.96 |
-22 | 1.02 |
-23 | 0.96 |
-24 | 0.93 |
-25 | 0.94 |
-26 | 0.99 |
-27 | 1.05 |
-28 | 1.01 |
-29 | 0.93 |
-30 | 1 |
-31 | 0.9 |
-32 | 0.91 |
-33 | 1.02 |
-34 | 0.96 |
comment:29 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
Mapped all bands - creating delivery.
comment:30 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
Delivery created, splitting VNIR and SWIR bands.
comment:31 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
After checking, determined SWIR data is OK so will deliver. Ready for DC.
comment:32 Changed 9 years ago by lah
Fenix DC
- line info & proj info xml files are missing.
- Have copied in missing logsheet and removed eagle & hawk pages (and renamed 075).
- renamed screenshots.
- check_bil_size reports: f075133b_mapped_osng.bil: BIL Filesize incorrect. Has correct no. bands and maps ok, so not sure what's wrong with it.
- under/overflows seem reasonable, but table goes off page. Readme needs recreating.
- scts look ok.
- spectra could do with double checking. SWIR seems rather high compared to VNIR. Our favourite spike is also present (bands 346-348 the cause).
Can't finish delivery check until xml files are created. Looking into fixing scripts.
comment:33 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
- Have generated line info and project info XML files.
- Tried reprocessing f075133b_mapped_osng.bil, still have error. Actual size 1559516964, calculated size 1558215740. Not sure why this is.
- Generated plots comparing to 6S simulated spectra, for some pixels looks OK for others SWIR is too high. Possibly integration time issue, will investigate further before sending.
comment:34 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
After more investigation determined SWIR is not usable (as originally though). Splitting off bands.
comment:35 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
- Removed SWIR bands and updated Readme
- Trimmed off additional bytes from end of f075133b_mapped_osng.bil
- Ready for DC
comment:36 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Starting fenix delivery Check
comment:37 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Fenix delivery check
- Since SWIR bands have been removed, we should remove SWIR overflows and underflows from read me
- f075333b_mapped_osng.bil is reporting incorrect filesize.
comment:38 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Processing
- Have removed SWIR bands from readme.
- f075333b_mapped_osng.bil has lost most of the information from the header file. Needs to be recreated.
comment:39 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Fenix Processing
-f075333b_mapped_osng.bi recreated, removed SWIR bands and replaced the .bil and .hdr files on delivery directory. Still complaining about size. I believe is the same error that f075133b_mapped_osng.bil and probably needs to be trimmed.
comment:40 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Fenix Processing
-Flightline f075333b_mapped_osng.bil recreated a second time using apl and repleaced. Not complaining about size any more..
-In the process discover some missing info in the .hdr files. Corrected manually all *1b.bil.hdr
comment:41 Changed 9 years ago by asm
Fenix Processing
-All .hdr files corrected. Should be ready to continue DC.
comment:42 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Fenix Delivery Check
Everything okay now.
Zipping mapped files then ready to deliver
comment:43 Changed 9 years ago by gej
Fenix Delivery Check
Mapped Files zipped
Ready for delivery
comment:44 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Fenix Delivery
Dispatched Fenix data on USB hard drive to Ross Hill 15/09/2015
comment:45 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Ross Hill confirmed receipt of hard drive (17/09/2015). Has mailed back.
comment:46 Changed 8 years ago by dac
Archiving
Tidied up and started uploading to NEODC (running on gridmaster4).
comment:47 Changed 8 years ago by asm
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Archiving
Data is available from NEODC
There is a problem with the Fenix data, the .nav and .f98 files are blank.
From Tom:
Okay there was a problem with the Fenix PPS cable (bad solder joint) hence the reason that the .f98 and .nav files are empty. You will have to talk to Gary as we have been informed that there are enough ground control points on the Monks Wood site for the data to be corrected. Also the navigation data was collected and is there for the Fenix, it just wasn't included in the sensor generated files.