Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 4 years ago
#655 new flight processing
HyTES/19, flight day 171a/2019, Grosseto
Reported by: | wja | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | dac@… | Other processors: |
Description
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2019/flight_data/italy/HyTES19-2019_169_Grosseto
Data arrived from Kings College London via hardisk on July 15 2019.
Scientific objective: Joint NASA and ESA campaign flying JPL’s HyTES thermal instrument over sites in Europe with a focus on crops and soil. Aim is to inform the future Land Surface Temperature Monitoring (LSTM) satellite mission. The NCEO Fenix instrument was flown alongside HyTES to provide visible – SWIR hyperspectral data.
PI: Martin Wooster
Sensors:
Fenix (requested, flown)
Change History (21)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by wja
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by wja
- Cc dac@… added
Navigation Processing
PPP processing is hanging and reporting Warning: Non-sequential IMU record times detected (-0.001) Cur Time: 369526.007 Prev Time: 369526.006.
Will continue processing other flights before returning to this.
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by asm
Nav Processing
Navigation processed via PPP. Accuracy looking good:
-Lat and lon sepparation under 0.05m and height separation under 0.08
-Position accuracy under 0.020
-Everything else looking good
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by seg
Fenix Processing
Started processing.
GPS end time had to be changed for
- FENIX171a-19-1.hdr
This was because the start time was the same as the end time. Minute was added to end time for these files to allow generation of config file
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by seg
Logsheet Creation
Log Sheets generated, flight line plot not generated and no KML file either so there is no plot at the moment
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by seg
Fenix Processing
SCT values identified
Flightline | FENIX |
1.00 | 80.3 |
1.01 | 80.3 |
2 | 1.87 |
3 | 1.86 |
4 | 2.57 |
5 | 14.02 |
6 | 2.45 |
7 | 0.96 |
8 | 2.23 |
DEM file had to be increased in size to allow processing of 1.01
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by wja
Hyperspectral Processing
Delivery created.
Still need 2019 data quality and calibration reports.
comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by asm
Hyperspectral Delivery Check
Started
comment:9 Changed 5 years ago by asm
Hyperspectral Delivery Check
Looks like the 2 parts from flightline 1 are showing different SCTs, this is either a problem with the SCT or the fps (more likely). It will need further processing.
Apart from that I had a quick look:
-Lines 03 and 05 look a bit wobbly in the curves of the aircraft, it could be a problem with the SCT (second decimal perhaps). If not a note should be added on the quality remarks
-APL commands are not working, the igm file has different name in aplcorr and aplmap examples
-Readme looks good, specially the data quality remarks (except content on previous messages)
comment:10 Changed 5 years ago by seg
Fenix Processing
Fixed FPS for Flighline 1 from 31 to 20.949. Split lines now have same sct of 80.3
Fixed FPS for Flightline 5 from 93 to 92.453.
Fixed FPS for Flightline 3 from 93 to 92.599
Fixed FPS for Flightline 7 from 93 to 92.611
Fixed FPS for Flightline 4 from 93 to 92.6085
Fixed FPS for Flightline 2 from 93 to 92.511
comment:11 Changed 5 years ago by seg
Fenix Processing
Ready for delivery check again
comment:12 Changed 5 years ago by wja
Starting Delivery Check
comment:13 Changed 5 years ago by wja
Delivery Check
- The 'Logsheet flightline name' table in the readme has the wrong numbers lined up with the flightline names (also missing flightline 1).
- Strange formatting in the 'Quality and issues with data ' section of the ReadMe (e.g words split over new lines).
- Remove fodis directory (flightlines/fodis/)
- Change the underflows in the readme to the following:
- Line 1:
- Part 0: Underflows from 347 - 621
- Part 1: Underflows from 241 - 621
- Line 2: Underflows from 1 - 6 & 174 - 447 (SWIR)
- Line 3: Underflows from 155 - 447 (SWIR) *Line 4: Underflows from 174 - 447 (SWIR)
- Line 5: Underflows from 1 - 7 & 174 - 447 (SWIR)
- Line 6: Underflows from 1 - 4 & 174 - 447 (SWIR) *Line 7: Underflows from 1 - 6 & 174 - 447 (SWIR)
- Line 8: Underflows from 1 - 7 & 174 - 447 (SWIR)
- Line 1:
comment:14 Changed 5 years ago by wja
Delivery Check
Looks ready to delivery, once mapped BIL files are zipped.
comment:15 Changed 5 years ago by wja
Hyperspectral Delivery
Zipping mapped data
comment:16 Changed 5 years ago by wja
Delivery Sent to PI
Delivery finalised
comment:17 Changed 4 years ago by wja
Fenix Reprocessing
All fenix flightlines are very low SWIR values and require reprocessing to investigate.
comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by wja
Fenix Reprocessing
Bands have been removed to the following:
Line | VNIR Binning Factor | Number of Bands | Max Wavelength |
1 | 2 | 345 | 969.52 nm |
2 - 8 | 4 | 174 | 970.38 nm |
Data has been processed using ATCOR. Spectra of lines 1 & 5 (which have targets visible) compare well to field spectra.
Ready for checking
comment:19 Changed 4 years ago by wja
Fenix Delivery
Bands have been dropped from level1b & mapped data (along with reflectance products).
Delivery placed on FTP slot 15, PI notified & delivery finalised.
comment:20 Changed 4 years ago by wja
Archiving
Added to postGIS.
Started rsync to CEDA
comment:21 Changed 4 years ago by wja
Archiving
Transfer for CEDA complete
Navigation Processing
Basestation data converted to RINEX. Of the three RINEX files (which contain multiple days of data), a file for this date has been created with the following command: