Opened 11 months ago
Last modified 3 weeks ago
#692 new flight processing
Owl test flight, flight day 178a/2022, Alconbury
Reported by: | wja | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description
Owl with adjustable roll. PhaseOne Also flown but data not received yet.
Received 28/06/2022 via FTP.
Change History (12)
comment:1 Changed 11 months ago by wja
comment:2 Changed 11 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
All bands processed to level1b
comment:3 Changed 10 months ago by wja
Navigation Processing
Have processed IPAS navigation on IPAS TC (this is the nav system attached to the Owl).
SNEO (OS) basestation used, precise ephemeris and clock accessed from CDDIS, lever arms were estimated as ~-0.06, variable, -1.45.
Position seperation is not great - largely within ~+/- 0.2 in X, Y & Z.
comment:4 Changed 5 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
3 band mapped bands look good. Mapping all bands.
comment:5 Changed 5 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
All bands mapped.
comment:6 Changed 2 months ago by wja
Owl Delivery
Creating delivery
comment:7 Changed 2 months ago by wja
Owl Delivery
Awaiting delivery check
comment:8 Changed 5 weeks ago by asm
Owl Delivery Check
Started.
comment:9 Changed 5 weeks ago by asm
Owl Delivery Check
The DEM file does not correspond with this project code (it is GB22_00 and should be GB22_01). Because of that, check_apl_cmd is not working. Also worth checking if the DEM is indeed for this area.
All other checks have been run and everything passed the tests:
-This is UTM30 instead of OSNG following request of PI (might be worth noting here on ticket)
-Mapped files have align nicely
-This is a flight with different off nadir angles
-Screenshots and xml files look good
-Data looks good on fastQC
-All other checks are fine
I will re-run check_apl_cmd once the DEM has been corrected and that should make this delivery ready to be delivered.
comment:10 Changed 5 weeks ago by wja
Owl Delivery
DEM project code updates (sorry about that).
Rerunning check_apl_cmd locally, will let you know when it's done.
Thanks!
comment:11 Changed 4 weeks ago by wja
check_apl_cmd run successfully.
comment:12 Changed 3 weeks ago by dac
Owl Delivery
Outputs from check_apl_cmd look good - ready to go.
Unpacking
Same errors are previous flight regarding some sort of overflow happening with the framecounting.
Also warning about missing controller name in the header files.