Opened 2 years ago
Last modified 21 months ago
#698 new flight processing
Owl Test, flight day 186a/2022, Duxford
Reported by: | wja | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description
Owl on mount with adjustable roll.
Received via FTP 30/08/22/
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by wja
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by wja
Nav Data
We recieved this flight's data too late to access basestation data from the OS's FTP. I have put a request to BIGF to access 30s RINEX data for the following stations (which cover the start / end times recorded in the Owl headers).
- PETE
- SNEO
- NEWR
- STEE
- ARDL
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by wja
Navigation Processing
Received RINEX data from BIGF for the following stations:
- ARDL
- ATTL
- NEWR
- PETE
- SKEE
- SNEO
- STEE
- WELL
*WEYB
Along with broadcast ephemeris data.
BIGF will need acknowledging in data delivery.
comment:4 Changed 23 months ago by wja
Nav Processing
Completed for IPAS20 IMU (only to be used with Owl data).
Position separate in the Z axis was slightly high for a period at ~0.075 m. The position accuracy for the X & Y axes are high, at ~0.06 m.
comment:5 Changed 22 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
Currently running radiometric calibration on raw data
comment:6 Changed 22 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
Owl radiometric calibration complete.
comment:7 Changed 22 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
3 bands mapped, geoaccuracy looks okay.
Mapping all bands.
comment:8 Changed 22 months ago by wja
Owl Processing
All bands mapped.
comment:9 Changed 22 months ago by wja
Creating Owl Delivery
comment:10 Changed 22 months ago by wja
Delivery needs checking
comment:11 Changed 22 months ago by dac
Delivery Check
- Readme looks good
- check_apl_cmd ran through OK
- check_bil_size.py didn't result in any errors.
- Alignment between lines looks good. There is some distortion around the buildings at Duxford which might be fixed using a higher resolution DEM. We do have a LiDAR one so perhaps mention this when delivering.
- Project code needs changing in line_information xml files.
- Looking at the level1b masked files there seem a lot of pixels masked out when checking the spectra, can't remember if this is what we normally expect for Owl though.
After check of masking and fixing project code in XML good to go.
comment:12 Changed 21 months ago by wja
Ready to Deliver
XMLs updated. Masking is comparable to 2018 lines.
comment:13 Changed 21 months ago by wja
zipping mapped.
comment:14 Changed 21 months ago by wja
Delivery Sent
Delivery sent via FTP on 31/01/23.
Unpacking Checks
Raw applanix data appears corrupted (along with 186b). Callum reported that there are errors with the unit writing via USB so had to resort to ethernet.
No issues flag with old IPAS system (on adjustable Owl mount) at this point.