Opened 9 days ago
Last modified 2 hours ago
#738 new flight processing
CarbonARA25, flight day 289/2025, Brazil
| Reported by: | petwa | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Other processors: |
Description
/users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2025/flight_data/brazil/CarbonARA25-2025_289_Brazil/
Data arrived on 01/04/2026
PI: Martin Wooster
Sensors:
-Owl
-Fenix1k
-IBIS
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 8 days ago by petwa
comment:2 Changed 5 hours ago by mark1
Looking at Ibis data, there are missing dark frames for some lines:
IBIS289-25-2
IBIS289-25-3
IBIS289-25-5
IBIS289-25-6
IBIS289-25-9
IBIS289-25-21
IBIS289-25-28
IBIS289-25-31
IBIS289-25-40
IBIS289-25-43
IBIS289-25-44
It would be possible to process using dark frames from neighbouring files but with increase in uncertainty of radiometric calibration.
comment:3 Changed 5 hours ago by mark1
comment:4 Changed 5 hours ago by mark1
Doesn't seem to be a logsheet for this flight to check against any details.
comment:5 Changed 5 hours ago by mark1
Have sent the Owl data calibration processing to the grid.
comment:6 Changed 2 hours ago by mark1
Sent the Ibis and Owl mapping to the grid.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Project unpacking
Fenix1k:
All OK.
Owl:
All OK.
Ibis:
There is missing calibration file in dir i25289_0006
There is missing calibration file in dir i25289_0009
Moved to not-working
run_unpacked_checks.py found nav file errors in all Fenix1k flightlines.