Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#352 accepted flight processing
GB07/09, Flight day 212a/2010, Alps
Reported by: | ella | Owned by: | knpa |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 medium | Milestone: | 2010 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by iopa)
Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2010/flight_data/archive-overflow/GB07_09-2010_212a_Alps
Project has been fast copied to ~arsf/workspace.
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 9th August 2010.
Scientific objective: Remote sensing support for research into the processes and rates of supraglacial debris cover formation on alpine glaciers, and on the response of glaciers to increases in supraglacial mass loading.
Priority: a4
PI:Benjamin Brock (and Martin Kirkbridge)
PLEASE NOTE:This project has a dual PI and we should cc Matin Kirkbridge on all emails. Data delivery should also be offered to Martin Kirkbridge, too.
Sensors:
- Eagle (12/05/11)
- Hawk (12/05/11)
- Leica LIDAR (20/09/10)
- RCD Camera (16/09/10)
Attachments (1)
Change History (44)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by ella
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by ella
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by ella
- Description modified (diff)
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by jb362
comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by jb362
I'm leaving the hyperspectral processing until we have processed the LiDAR for this project since the SRTM dem is useless in such steep terrain.
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by ella
IPAS navigation now processed.
[Applanix already completed by jb362]
comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by emca
- Owner set to emca
- Status changed from new to accepted
Starting LiDAR processing
comment:8 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Starting camera check.
comment:9 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Camera check:
1) delete camera delivery log from photographs dir
2) exiftool sample run has used the camera_delivery.log in the readme, readme needs re-creating
All else seems correct.
Note: readme front page contains both the name of the PI as given in the application and the name of collaborator 2 who was entered as the PI in the logsheet.
comment:10 Changed 14 years ago by jb362
Camera ready for delivery.
comment:11 Changed 14 years ago by jb362
Iopa will be delivering this for me since I'm leaving.
comment:12 Changed 14 years ago by emca
LiDAR data ready for delivery check at
~airborne/workspace/GB07_09-2010_212a_Alps/delivery/20100910/GB07_09
comment:13 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
- Description modified (diff)
RCD camera was dispatched today, 16th September 2010.
comment:14 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Delivery checking LiDAR
comment:15 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Delivery check report;
All is good and ready to deliver.
comment:17 Changed 14 years ago by emca
- Status changed from accepted to assigned
LiDAR and Camera data have been rsync'd to
~arsf/arsf_data/2010/flight_data/western_europe/GB07_09-2010_212a_Alps
comment:18 Changed 14 years ago by knpa
Appears to be an issue with the bandset labels in the header files; they start at 900nm which is lower than it should be. Possibly incorrect bandset selected or none specified. Will leave this until end of the year and new Hawk calibration.
comment:19 Changed 14 years ago by benj
- Description modified (diff)
comment:20 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Taking hyperspectral.
comment:21 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Hyperspectral status:
All data has been run thhrough azgcorr but the level 3's show tearings and various bad effects caused by the low resolution of the SRTM DEM that was then patched with the LiDAR
and the patching introduced great discontinuities. SRTM-only DEM previously showed even
worse effects.
In progress was the use of an ASTER DEM which would be patched to LiDAR, but before that it would be interpolated with 'cubic convolution' (through ENVI which can do this for BIL DEMs, GRASS can output BIL and then ENVI can do the interpolation and then back to GRASS for the patching),but while the interpolation succeeded the patching myself I did not succeed with and that is where this stands.
comment:22 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Hyperspectral has been processed and delivery is ready for checking.
@ /users/rsg/arsf/workspace/GB07_09-2010_212a_Alps/delivery/20110511/GB07_09
comment:23 Changed 14 years ago by emca
Taking hyperspectral delivery check
comment:24 Changed 14 years ago by emca
Eagle/Hawk line 1 does not process without -bend, can you remove the offending lines from the lev1 files
You've included the datum/correction file in the delivery, but its not used in the sample command - is this file needed to process the data?
Change the project code on the logsheet to GB07/09
Dem name needs to be *-aster.dem to be comply to standard
Add the SCT's to the ticket
Otherwise data looks good
comment:25 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Delivery fixes have been made, data is getting ready for dispatch.
comment:26 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
Hyperspectral dispatched to PI Ben Brock on 12th May 2011.
comment:27 Changed 14 years ago by iopa
- Description modified (diff)
Project has been tidied and r-synced to the repository.
comment:28 Changed 14 years ago by emca
- Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
comment:29 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Reprocessing hyperspectral with APL.
comment:30 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Stages 1&2 completed.
comment:31 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Stage 3 tested successfully.
There is an issue with hawk line 7 however that stopped this moving beyond lev1 - apl claims no matching sync message in nav file that matches hdr times.
comment:32 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Fixed this issue.
comment:33 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Deleted delivery and reprocessing as apl chain has been updated to generate additional masked files.
comment:34 Changed 13 years ago by knpa
Re-ran stage 2 for Hawk as aplcal has been updated in relation to the bad pixel file.
comment:35 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
ReadMe created, ready for delivery check.
comment:36 Changed 12 years ago by emca
Delivery checked reprocessed apl data. Lev3 data looks a bit mismatched in some areas (where there is no lidar overlap) but this is due lack of good DEM coverage.
- Flight letter missing from Readme (project details + delivery contents)
- Readme: Level 3 (pg 4) gdal_translate sample command and paragraph after sample command problem with band list ("-b b -b a -b n", "b, a, n, d, s, , 3, 0, „ , 1, 5, „ , 7")
- DEM and logsheet named incorrectly (- vs. _)
comment:37 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
- Owner changed from emca to knpa
- Status changed from assigned to accepted
comment:38 Changed 12 years ago by knpa
- Milestone set to 2010 data processing completion
Fixed above points.
Delivery of reprocessed HS has not been requested so this is finished.
comment:39 Changed 11 years ago by knpa
Merged and deleted workspace version.
comment:40 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Archiving
Started uploading camera, LiDAR and raw data to NEODC. Reprocessed hyperspectral already archived.
comment:41 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Archiving
Data uploaded to NEODC.
comment:42 Changed 9 years ago by dac
Archiving
Processed data available from NEODC (http://browse.ceda.ac.uk/browse/neodc/arsf/2010/GB07_09/GB07_09-2010_212a_Alps) - raw data uploaded but not yet archived.
comment:43 Changed 8 years ago by dac
Archiving
Raw data now available from NEODC.
Starting hyperspectral processing.