Opened 8 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

#394 assigned flight processing

EU11/03, flight day 100/2011, Alcornocales (South)

Reported by: knpa Owned by: knpa
Priority: alpha 4 low Milestone: 2011 data processing completion
Component: Archiving Keywords:
Cc: Other processors:

Description (last modified by knpa)

Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EU11_03-2011_100_Alcornocales_South/

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 14/09/11.

Scientific objective:
We wish to measure how these forests change over gradients
of topography‐controlled climate and soil properties

Priority: a4l

PI: D. Coomes

Sensors:

  • Eagle (24/06/2011)
  • Hawk (24/06/2011)
  • Leica LIDAR Replacement (24/06/2011)
  • RCD (24/06/2011)

Change History (16)

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by anch

Processing RAW camera to tif

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by anch

Creating thumbnails

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by iopa

Camera is ready for checking @ ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EU11_03-2011_100_Alcornocales_South/processing/delivery/camera-EU11_03-100-20110615

Raw images taken before flight and removed ;
1-15
Raw images with cloud or saturated and removed ;
71,84-86

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by anch

Taking delivery check

comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by anch

Checked delivery.

All looks fine to deliver, except binaries are required in the bin folder.

comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by anch

Regarding delivery check above:

That was the hyperspectral delivery

comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by emca

Camera read_me needs to be updated to account for new entries in eventfile. I've fixed this in the template so either re-create the readme or edit for above changes.

KML file missing from contents.

Thumbnails in readme do not match the images in the thumbnails directory, e.g image 56 in readme is not image 56 in thumbnails dir. Similarly, photographs and thumbnails image names do not correspond correctly.

KML file is not correct. Eagle/hawk lines 4, 6, 9 and 5 are not showing in the correct places.

comment:8 Changed 8 years ago by emca

KML file is also named incorrectly, should contain julian day and year

comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by iopa

Errors have been amended and delivery is now ready.

comment:10 Changed 8 years ago by emca

LiDAR Delivery Check:

Data looks good. Few changes to readme:

  • DEM resolution is incorrect
  • wg84-utm DEM is named incorrectly
  • Overlap stats seem high - if they were computed using a script and not by hand, need to change readme to reflect this.

Otherwise data is good to go.

comment:11 Changed 8 years ago by iopa

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:12 Changed 8 years ago by knpa

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:13 Changed 7 years ago by mark1

Hyperspectral hawk bad pixel files and XML files have been re-created and re-delivered to PI (via email). This corrects sample number in bad pixel text files and Eagle IFOV value in XML and extra comments included.

comment:14 Changed 7 years ago by adbe

Hyperspectral sct's

lineeaglehawk
1-0.15-0.09
2-0.060.06
30.08-0.03
4-0.06-0.04
5-0.05-0.01
6-0.08-0.10
7-0.04-0.06
8-0.050.04
9-0.050.04
100.10-0.02
110.02-0.05
12-0.06-0.03
13-0.080.05
140.03-0.09
15-0.04-0.08
16-0.100.02
170.030.00
18-0.05-0.06

comment:15 Changed 7 years ago by knpa

  • Component changed from Processing: general to Archiving
  • Milestone set to 2011 data processing completion
  • Owner set to knpa
  • Status changed from new to assigned

Beginning archiving.

comment:16 Changed 6 years ago by knpa

Backed up by NEODC.

Moved to archive disk.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.