Opened 10 years ago

Last modified 8 years ago

#394 assigned flight processing

EU11/03, flight day 100/2011, Alcornocales (South) — at Version 11

Reported by: knpa Owned by:
Priority: alpha 4 low Milestone: 2011 data processing completion
Component: Archiving Keywords:
Cc: Other processors:

Description (last modified by iopa)

Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EU11_03-2011_100_Alcornocales_South/

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 14/09/11.

Scientific objective:
We wish to measure how these forests change over gradients
of topography‐controlled climate and soil properties

Priority: a4l

PI: D. Coomes


  • Eagle (24/06/2011)
  • Hawk (24/06/2011)
  • Leica LIDAR (24/06/2011)
  • RCD (24/06/2011)

Change History (11)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by anch

Processing RAW camera to tif

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by anch

Creating thumbnails

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by iopa

Camera is ready for checking @ ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EU11_03-2011_100_Alcornocales_South/processing/delivery/camera-EU11_03-100-20110615

Raw images taken before flight and removed ;
Raw images with cloud or saturated and removed ;

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by anch

Taking delivery check

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by anch

Checked delivery.

All looks fine to deliver, except binaries are required in the bin folder.

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by anch

Regarding delivery check above:

That was the hyperspectral delivery

comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by emca

Camera read_me needs to be updated to account for new entries in eventfile. I've fixed this in the template so either re-create the readme or edit for above changes.

KML file missing from contents.

Thumbnails in readme do not match the images in the thumbnails directory, e.g image 56 in readme is not image 56 in thumbnails dir. Similarly, photographs and thumbnails image names do not correspond correctly.

KML file is not correct. Eagle/hawk lines 4, 6, 9 and 5 are not showing in the correct places.

comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by emca

KML file is also named incorrectly, should contain julian day and year

comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by iopa

Errors have been amended and delivery is now ready.

comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by emca

LiDAR Delivery Check:

Data looks good. Few changes to readme:

  • DEM resolution is incorrect
  • wg84-utm DEM is named incorrectly
  • Overlap stats seem high - if they were computed using a script and not by hand, need to change readme to reflect this.

Otherwise data is good to go.

comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by iopa

  • Description modified (diff)
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.