Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 11 years ago
#394 assigned flight processing
EU11/03, flight day 100/2011, Alcornocales (South) — at Version 11
Reported by: | knpa | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | alpha 4 low | Milestone: | 2011 data processing completion |
Component: | Archiving | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description (last modified by iopa)
Data location: ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EU11_03-2011_100_Alcornocales_South/
Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 14/09/11.
Scientific objective:
We wish to measure how these forests change over gradients
of topography‐controlled climate and soil properties
Priority: a4l
PI: D. Coomes
Sensors:
- Eagle (24/06/2011)
- Hawk (24/06/2011)
- Leica LIDAR (24/06/2011)
- RCD (24/06/2011)
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by anch
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by anch
Creating thumbnails
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by iopa
Camera is ready for checking @ ~arsf/arsf_data/2011/flight_data/spain_portugal/EU11_03-2011_100_Alcornocales_South/processing/delivery/camera-EU11_03-100-20110615
Raw images taken before flight and removed ;
1-15
Raw images with cloud or saturated and removed ;
71,84-86
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by anch
Taking delivery check
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by anch
Checked delivery.
All looks fine to deliver, except binaries are required in the bin folder.
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by anch
Regarding delivery check above:
That was the hyperspectral delivery
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by emca
Camera read_me needs to be updated to account for new entries in eventfile. I've fixed this in the template so either re-create the readme or edit for above changes.
KML file missing from contents.
Thumbnails in readme do not match the images in the thumbnails directory, e.g image 56 in readme is not image 56 in thumbnails dir. Similarly, photographs and thumbnails image names do not correspond correctly.
KML file is not correct. Eagle/hawk lines 4, 6, 9 and 5 are not showing in the correct places.
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by emca
KML file is also named incorrectly, should contain julian day and year
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by iopa
Errors have been amended and delivery is now ready.
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by emca
LiDAR Delivery Check:
Data looks good. Few changes to readme:
- DEM resolution is incorrect
- wg84-utm DEM is named incorrectly
- Overlap stats seem high - if they were computed using a script and not by hand, need to change readme to reflect this.
Otherwise data is good to go.
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by iopa
- Description modified (diff)
Processing RAW camera to tif