IG13/19, flight day 219/2013, Virkisjokull

[knpa]

Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2013/flight_data/greenland_iceland/IG13_19-2013_219_Virkisjokull

Data arrived from ARSF via network transfer on 23/08/2013

IG13/19 Scientific objective: unknown

IG13/19 Priority: 8

PI: Tom Bradwell

Notes: Some lidar lines have no returns due to surface water.

Sensors:

Camera (dispatched 22/10/2013)
Eagle (dispatched 22/10/2013)
Hawk (dispatched 22/10/2013)
LiDAR (dispatched 22/10/2013)

[tipo]

Started navigation processing.

[edfi]

Nav initially processed using PPP whilst waiting for good nav.

Hyperspectral started

RCD conversion to Tiff completed

[edfi]

Navigation improved

Processing hyperspectral with SCTs

LiDAR started initial run.

PPP_base (KVSK)
63 58 56.07578
-16 25 57.81442
98.505

[edfi]

Hyperspectral ready to D/C

[edfi]

Adjusted the processed event file (new version: processed2) so that the Raw and Tif labels are correct, also removed the event information for all the images as the records had repeats which are wrong. These problem are likely to be due to instrument error.

[edfi]

Realised LiDAR delivery is in UTM27 rather than UTM28. Will Remake delivery. Checked camera and hyperspectral both correct

[edfi]

adjustments made to LiDAR now in correct projection

[stgo]

Beginning hyperspectral D/C

[stgo]

Check_apl fails due to incomplete level 1 eagle file on line 1, have checked the logfile and it seems the processing did not complete. Have run check_apl to completion and all other files are fine.

Fodis should not be present in delivery or readme and the dem needs to be named according to IG13_19-2013_219-ASTER.dem

Additionally several hawk lines have a high level of underflow. 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 10

[stgo]

Finished LiDAR D/C, some lines have a very high level of noise classification (especially 5, 6 and 7) is it worth applying a stricter isolated points routine?

Nav file needs to be named according to conventions and the same for vectors screenshot.

Otherwise ready to deliver.

[stgo]

Finished RCD D/C, ready to deliver other than a few changes to readme:

• remove "The following is an overview of your photo collecion..." from image collection section, or the whole section if it make it flow better since there are no photos in the readme.
• make a note that the RCD images are not included in the KML file and that this only contains hyperspectral and LiDAR information.

[stgo]

Rechecked LiDAR and rcd, both are ready for delivery.

[edfi]

Hyperspectral adjustments

Reprocessed line 1, added underflow commented into read me and renamed DEM

[stgo]

Hyperspectral D/Cd, ready for delivery. Zipping mapped files then will start dispatch.

[edfi]

RCD, LiDAR and Hyperspectral Deliveries dispatched

[tipo]

Hawk 11's darkline transition isn't instant, it fades over the course of several lines. I've set the start of the darklines to a line after the transition, This leaves 2 or 3 lines of not-quite-light, not-quite-dark at the end of the processed image.

[dac]

Archiving

Started archiving

[dac]

Archiving

rsyncing data to NEODC

[dac]

Archiving

Data uploaded to NEODC via rsync 25/06/2015