Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#648 new flight processing
CA18/00, flight day 223a/2018, Red Lake, Ontario, Canada
Reported by: | dac | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description
Data location: /users/rsg/arsf/arsf_data/2018/flight_data/canada/CA18_207-2018_224a_Ontario
Data arrived from NERC-ARF via hard driver on 12/09/2018
Scientific objective: Boresight Flight for Canada
PI: NERC-ARF
- Missing navigation synchronisation data
- Framerate not recorded correctly
- Missing log files for Fenix
Sensors:
- Fenix (requested, flown)
- Owl (requested, flown)
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by asm
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by asm
Owl processing
Started. Symlinked T2 files from owl line 2 for owl line 2. Processed owl to level1b.
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by wja
Nav Processing
Basestation PPP identified as:
Latitude | 51°04'01.40120" |
Longitude | -93°48'14.26919" |
Ellipsoid Height | 346.797 |
Looks like the same data as 2018 224a.
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by wja
Nav Processing
Sol file produced from GNSS/IMU with IPAS TC.
Data quality looks good. Position separation had a few narrow peaks that exceed -+0.05m.
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by asm
Owl processing
It looks the sol file does not cover times for this data, it covers the data for 223b rather than "a". There was not ipas20 for this sortie, will ask operations.
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by asm
General processing
Also, the flightlines in sortie "b" were flown before flightlines in sortie "a"
comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by wja
comment:8 Changed 6 years ago by wja
comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by wja
Owl/Fenix Processing
Ignore my previous comments (which I have deleted). I mistook this ticket for 233a.
Apologies for any confusion.
Extra checks
-No use of nav files
-Great differences of fps and fps_qpf for Fenix
-Only 3 owl lines and the 3rd does not have T2.