Opened 4 months ago
Last modified 2 days ago
#707 new flight processing
SwathS, flight day 146/2023, Grosseto
Reported by: | jann | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | immediate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Processing: general | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Other processors: |
Description
Data location: /users/rsg/airborne/2023_arsf_data/flight_data/italy/SwathS_23-2023_146_Grosseto
Data arrived from NERC-ARF via hard drive September/October 2023
PI: Martin Wooster
Sensors:
Fenix1k (requested, flown)
IBIS ( main requested, flown)
OWL ( requested, flown)
Change History (16)
comment:1 Changed 4 months ago by jann
comment:2 Changed 4 months ago by wja
Navigation Processing
Basestation data converted to RINEX. All previous flights are also included in the basestation data, so just this flights data needed to be extracted (done with teqc).
GPS and GLONASS broadcast ephermides, along with precise ephemeris data accessed from CDDIS. PosPac could not access these itself.
Completed processing using the single base method.
This navigation data is a priority to be shared with collaborators working on the SWING instrument
comment:3 Changed 3 months ago by wja
Exported post-processed navigation data in ASCII at collaborator's request.
comment:4 Changed 7 weeks ago by jann
Missing calibration files for flight line 10, have used calibration files for flight line 9.
comment:5 Changed 7 weeks ago by jann
Missing calibration files for flight line 10, have used calibration files for flight line 9.
comment:6 Changed 7 weeks ago by jann
Radiometric calibration completed for all flightlines.
comment:7 Changed 6 weeks ago by wja
Fenix1k Processing
Geoaccuracy looks great, but the swath mask needs updating (looks like this will be the case for all flights between jdays 143 - 152).
comment:8 Changed 6 weeks ago by asm
Owl Processing
Flightlines 21 - 29 don't have GPS, are outside the navigation data and don't have usable data. Likely those were collected with the aircraft landed so will not process and move to another directory as are causing problems.
comment:9 Changed 6 weeks ago by asm
Owl Processing
Delivery has been created, this is now waiting for delivery check now.
comment:10 Changed 6 weeks ago by wja
Fenix1k Processing
Processing running through, mapping looks good.
Processing all bands.
comment:11 Changed 6 weeks ago by dac
Owl Delivery Check
- check_apl_cmd ran through OK.
- Logsheet overview image doesn't show any flightlines, also still lists aircraft as VP-FAZ rather than VP-FLB and copyright as 2021.
- Line information also lists aircraft as VP-FAZ.
Apart from updates to logsheet and metadata is good to go. Started zipping mapped files.
comment:12 Changed 6 weeks ago by wja
Aircraft is VP-FBL
comment:13 Changed 6 weeks ago by asm
Owl Delivery
Updated image on logsheet and corrected the plane name. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
comment:14 Changed 2 weeks ago by wja
Fenix Delivery Check
Starting checking
comment:15 Changed 10 days ago by wja
Fenix Delivery Check
I have done:
- Removed *aux.xml files
- Updated ReadMe (screenshots, filename table)
- Removed fodis directory
Everything else looks line (bands chacked with fastQC, spectra looks fine compared to 6S, mapping looks good enough with the APL command outputs and the mapped files).
Zipping mapped, then ready to delivery.
comment:16 Changed 2 days ago by wja
Fenix1K Delivery
Added geometry files (aplcorr --atmosfile outputs) to the deliveries at PI's request.
Notes from unpacking
OWL: Some lines don't have nav data, these are data recorded of NASA JPL's blackbody when the aircraft was stationary on the runway.
Final checks - warning about the real time navigation time stamps was flagged.